Daryl4
Full Access Member
The primary rig in question is an 89 Centurion 4 Door Bronco. NA7.3IDI, E4OD, D60, etc. Bought it about 2 weeks ago and the tranny is doing funky things. Most concerning is an RPM flare during the 2-3 shift. I intend this rig to be my primary do it all while never letting me down rig. Daily driver, some off-road adventures, some towing, and a BOV.
I'd always leaned towards manuals in the past, I like the control. But there's something to be said for not having to shift constantly. For being able to drive kinda lazy, drive when injured, multi task better while driving, let the woman drive, etc.
Then there's the reliability question. There's those that say a good E4OD is more durable then a ZF5. The ZF can break sure but it's primary long run failure is going to be the clutch. But what about the E4OD, lot's to fail, but does it... Or when it does isn't it often still limpable?
Cost/hassle my current line of thinking seeing as I need to keep this rig drivable with only short interruptions for a while is to keep doing maintenance(dark but not burnt fluid) and get a Baumann controller for it. I'm thinking with the Baumann I'll have the best of both worlds. About as much control as is possible with a slushbox and the daily ease of an auto. But that's if this tranny can survive a while. On the other hand I have an IDI/ZF5 4WD F250 that's barely worth not parting. So there's all the parts I'd need to swap to a ZF5. But I'd have to do the work and have the rig down a while.
But which is better in the long run, even if in the long term I need to buy/rebuild a E4OD I can do that, but is it worth it, I'm torn.
Shoot after writing all that it sounds like I'm leaning E4OD, what say you? Is the E4OD just too much hassle and should be avoided?
I'd always leaned towards manuals in the past, I like the control. But there's something to be said for not having to shift constantly. For being able to drive kinda lazy, drive when injured, multi task better while driving, let the woman drive, etc.
Then there's the reliability question. There's those that say a good E4OD is more durable then a ZF5. The ZF can break sure but it's primary long run failure is going to be the clutch. But what about the E4OD, lot's to fail, but does it... Or when it does isn't it often still limpable?
Cost/hassle my current line of thinking seeing as I need to keep this rig drivable with only short interruptions for a while is to keep doing maintenance(dark but not burnt fluid) and get a Baumann controller for it. I'm thinking with the Baumann I'll have the best of both worlds. About as much control as is possible with a slushbox and the daily ease of an auto. But that's if this tranny can survive a while. On the other hand I have an IDI/ZF5 4WD F250 that's barely worth not parting. So there's all the parts I'd need to swap to a ZF5. But I'd have to do the work and have the rig down a while.
But which is better in the long run, even if in the long term I need to buy/rebuild a E4OD I can do that, but is it worth it, I'm torn.
Shoot after writing all that it sounds like I'm leaning E4OD, what say you? Is the E4OD just too much hassle and should be avoided?