Different diameters?
My thinking on this is if that if one needs to be heavier or lighter due to engine balancing then every manufacturer would have to make every one a specific weight. So in example, if the turbo flex plate ones were (making up numbers here) 3 lbs and the non turbo was 2 lbs then every single manufactures all weight the exact same?
If you say yes then International would have had to make engines for automatic and stick transmissions. Because how would you take a 3 lb flex plate off and hang a 30 lb flywheel or a 60 lb dual mass flywheel on the same engine. Nobody thinks twice of changing from a auto trans to a stick or dual mass to a single mass flywheel.
The harmonic balancer Nero posted look to me like the new one is solid and the dirty one has rubber between the hub and outside so is that the difference in them? I would like to know the weight of each of them.
International used both ends of the crankshaft to do the harmonic dampening. The harmonic balancer and the flywheel work together as a set. In the real world mismatched components might live a long time but the original engineering showed that to maximize the life of components and minimize vibration and harmonics. They needed the different parts or international/ford wouldn’t have gone to the trouble of creating them for a 1-1/2 year run of engines when they had the powerstroke coming down the pipe. The other difference specific to the 5speed is that the turbo truck had a 12” clutch disk where the n/a had an 11” disk. I don’t remember if that affected how the surface was machined or not but the primary difference for both the auto and the manual was how they were counter balanced for the different rods and pistons. The overall difference in the weight of a flex plate vs a flywheel doesn’t have much to do with how they are balanced. Also remember that a flex plate has a torque converter attached to it so the overall rotating mass might be pretty close to the same but again that really doesn’t correlate with how they are counter-balanced.
LUK balances the single-mass flywheels specific to their application which is why they listed a different number for each.
I think there was a small block ford in the 80s/90s or older that commonly got the wrong flex plate installed by unknowledgeable weekenders doing engine swaps and tore up engine bearings and crankshafts. Maybe the 351 Windsor/Cleveland or maybe just the 302 depending on when/where it was built? I can’t remember the specifics but I remember the issue.
These trucks are getting to the point of anything to keep them on the road a bit longer is good enough but there was a difference and it was there for a real reason.
Might as well add the link to the “coffee table book”, that was referenced earlier, here as well for all those who haven’t see it in a while. It’s an excellent resource for all the differences in these motors, part numbers and helpful diagnostic tips and tricks at the end. It’s perfect reading material for that mid morning “coffee break.”
Best known as the "Coffee Table Books" they were printed to be handed our to Ford Technicians at Ford service training centers.
www.forddoctorsdts.com