f-two-fiddy
Registered User
I'm looking to swap the 93 to 134a and was have heard that the OBS 134 condensers had more tubes and fins. Is that true? I'd imagine I'll need a new accumulator/drier compatible with 134?
Unfortunately, I didn't get any pictures, but comparing a condenser for a 1994 F-350 (factory R-134a) with a condenser from a 1991 F-350 (factory R-12), they're definitely different. The R-134a condenser is far more efficient...it's a plate style as opposed to the tube-style you see on the R-12 system.Thanks, for the hit. I plan on doing a complete flush, and was looking for a new 134 condenser. IF they actually have a different design for 134.
Aren't the accumulator and expansion valve contained in one unit on the OBS systems?
I think it would be worth the cost, and effort to replace the R12 stuff with 134.
I did do a conversion on my gasser. No flush. Just a junkyard condenser and some pag. I Drew it down for an hour and added 3.5 cans of 134. The thing puts out 34 degree air at 85 degree outside temps. With over 350K miles and a LOT of rust. I really didn't care what happened to it. But, I was sure surprised at the way it cools!
My diesel is putting out 45 degree air at 85 degree outside temps.
That's no good at all...have you found a source that has reasonably reliable quality, or is it all hit-and-miss these days?Not all new condensers are designed with r134a. We have been returning new but unusable condensers due to low quality. Less tube and fin count than the stock r12 stuff even! Last one I saw was ordered for a 1996 and it only had 4 fins per inch...junk!
We pretty much stopped using 1800radiator over this
Not all new condensers are designed with r134a. We have been returning new but unusable condensers due to low quality. Less tube and fin count than the stock r12 stuff even! Last one I saw was ordered for a 1996 and it only had 4 fins per inch...junk!
We pretty much stopped using 1800radiator over this