IDIBRONCO
IDIBRONCO
VERY nice job on the up pipe.
I love those old ford cabovers!! I have thought about doing a project like you are talking about many times. I have never been close enough to one to know if an IDI or a DT or even a 6.7PS would fit in them. Love both of these projects ideas!!Crazy is OK (at least that is how I justify these not-normal thoughts...) You are doing exactly what I am planning for my next project, just with this old COE Ford, rather than an IH. Even my build plan for the 7.3 I have sitting in the corner of the shop is very similar to your 6.9. I plan on keeping the Clark 5 spd, and swapping to a lower gear rear axle (the 6.89 / 8.83:1 two speed rear is not going to do it for me). Stay with 40" tires and target that 70 to 75 mph @ 2500 RPM range.
Keep up the good work, and maybe by the time I get around to this one, yours will be done.
You must be registered for see images attach
I don't remember the biggest size, but I don't think that there was a 302. There was a 312 and (I think) and 292 for the smallest. I do also know that some Thunderbirds had an optional supercharged 312, but that's a different story.(either a 302 or 332,
292, 312, and 332I don't remember the biggest size, but I don't think that there was a 302. There was a 312 and (I think) and 292 for the smallest. I do also know that some Thunderbirds had an optional supercharged 312, but that's a different story.
I stand corrected.You guys are getting your Ford Y Blocks and Lincoln Y-Blocks confused. Two completely different engine families.
Ford Y-Block - Used in Ford and Mercury cars, pickups and up to Class 6 trucks. 272, 292, and 312 displacements. The 312 was car only. In production from 1954 to 1964, replaced by the Windsor V8 (260,289,302,351).
Lincoln Y-Block - Used in Lincoln Cars and Heavy Duty Trucks. 279, 302, 317, 332, 341, and 368 displacements. These engines had a much taller deck height then the Ford Y-block and the heads had a regular intake port layout unlike the stacked configuration used in the Ford Y-Block. Essentially the big block of the line-up in the early and mid 50's. In production from 1953 to 1963. Replaced by the MEL V8's in Lincoln cars, and the FE/FT and SuperDuty V8's in big trucks.
You must be registered for see images attach
Well I sure learned something here. If it would have happened early in the morning, I might have just gone back to sleep.Two completely different engine families.
That will be a very cool build! What would you use the truck for? Just because its bad a$$ or you got a something in mind for it? Mines a 7.3 I pulled a 6.9 out of it. Is that clark 5 speed a overdrive unit? My perkins swapped square body has a clark 580VO the O is for overdrive and behind that is a under over spicer brownie box gives me double over drive it doesn't have a tach but I'd guess its around 1500 rpm @ 70-75mph. If i go to 11r22.5 tires on my binder with the overdrive from the eaton fuller I should be around 2800rpm at 75mph which is just fine by me it will deffinetly need some rpm to keep that big turbo going I put on but I figure turning some more rpm is better than trying to lug at lower rpms making lots of heat and smoke. That 13 speed will enable me to keep it right in the power band. On your truck I would consider putting more modern axles under it with disc brakes because I'm assuming it has juice brakes then I would find a way to mount a hydroboost and make it dual circuit brakes too. I have a 69 ford F6000 dump truck the extra 0 over a F600 means it's diesel that being said it has a Ford v150 diesel under the hood which is just a Caterpillar 1140 painted blue. Ford had a contract with Cat for the first cat medium duty diesel truck engines.Crazy is OK (at least that is how I justify these not-normal thoughts...) You are doing exactly what I am planning for my next project, just with this old COE Ford, rather than an IH. Even my build plan for the 7.3 I have sitting in the corner of the shop is very similar to your 6.9. I plan on keeping the Clark 5 spd, and swapping to a lower gear rear axle (the 6.89 / 8.83:1 two speed rear is not going to do it for me). Stay with 40" tires and target that 70 to 75 mph @ 2500 RPM range.
Keep up the good work, and maybe by the time I get around to this one, yours will be done.
You must be registered for see images attach