Scrap the 7.3 for a 6.9? How much do I need to worry about cavitation?

DNR0721

Registered User
Joined
May 8, 2012
Posts
23
Reaction score
0
Location
Vancouver, WA
OK. Kicking myself for not doing more research on these older engines.

I bought a '92 F250 XLT w/7.3 turbo to put into my dually gasser. Now I'm afraid to dump any more time and money into this 7.3. I bought it without seeing or hearing it run - yeah I know - STUPID!!! cookoo

Anyway, I just don't know if it's worth it to even find out if the block has pinholes (cavitation). If it doesn't, I still don't know the history of the truck/engine and it may just be a matter of time before I get cavitation.

If I use the right coolant additive, replace the downpipe, install an intercooler, can I safely rebuild the engine and expect many years of use, or should I go right now for a 6.9 I know is running?

:dunno
 

justinray

Contributor
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Posts
1,141
Reaction score
2
Location
Cleveland, Tx
Add the coolant additive after tearing off the heads and inspecting the cylinder walls and you'll be shining like a diamond.
 

88 Ford

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Posts
1,784
Reaction score
6
Location
San Diego, CA
If you check it out and it looks good you should be good like justinray said. I'm also not sure why everyone adds the additive to the coolant when you can swap over to iirc the extended life stuff and not have to worry about monitoring the levels in the coolant. Am I wong about the extended life stuff? Cus I swear I heard that it prevents cavitation and that is why they use it in industrial engines...

Also as far as building a 6.9 or 7.3, there are pros and cons to both. I would say keep what you have. Cavitation is minimal especially if you prevent it.
 

Kevin 007

Full-floater
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
1,966
Reaction score
245
Location
Nelson BC Canada
If your engine is ends up running fine without any coolant loss or presurization and such, then start using the right coolant and you will stop the advancement of cavitation in its tracks, pretty well. Then you should be just fine. you can't reverse the possible damage that cavitation has done but you can slow it down if not, stop it fully! don't worry about it that much. Oh, replace the oil cooler oring before you put that motor in!!
 

DNR0721

Registered User
Joined
May 8, 2012
Posts
23
Reaction score
0
Location
Vancouver, WA
OK. I'm hoping for the best. Getting the block hot tanked and pressure tested this weekend. We'll see.
 

ocnorb

IDIT
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Posts
1,320
Reaction score
319
Location
Wasatch Front
Is there any anti freeze left in the block that you could do an SCA test on?

Not sure, but it might give you some piece of mind. Tested a junkyard 7.3 out of a '92- it looked real good. Seems like by '92 it should have been a fairly well known issue..??
 

gdhillon

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Posts
1,193
Reaction score
0
Location
PG...Canada
If you check it out and it looks good you should be good like justinray said. I'm also not sure why everyone adds the additive to the coolant when you can swap over to iirc the extended life stuff and not have to worry about monitoring the levels in the coolant. Am I wong about the extended life stuff? Cus I swear I heard that it prevents cavitation and that is why they use it in industrial engines...

Also as far as building a 6.9 or 7.3, there are pros and cons to both. I would say keep what you have. Cavitation is minimal especially if you prevent it.

I'm curious about this to
 

88 Ford

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Posts
1,784
Reaction score
6
Location
San Diego, CA
OK. I'm hoping for the best. Getting the block hot tanked and pressure tested this weekend. We'll see.

What all are you doing to the internals? Are you dropping the compression at all? Anything else special you are doing?
 

gdhillon

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Posts
1,193
Reaction score
0
Location
PG...Canada
Ya the guys at pete told me that to and after a certain amount of kms to add some cat elc (I believe its extended life coolant)...I'm sure I've read about it on here before to
 

DNR0721

Registered User
Joined
May 8, 2012
Posts
23
Reaction score
0
Location
Vancouver, WA
What all are you doing to the internals? Are you dropping the compression at all? Anything else special you are doing?


I was not planning anything special besides ceramic coating the piston heads. No changes planned to the heads or cylinders. I was planning to bore, but with reminders from members in the forum about how thin the walls are already, I decided against that.

Would dropping the compression help? I imagine less compression = less heat and stress on the cylinders themselves. Power loss as well?
 

DNR0721

Registered User
Joined
May 8, 2012
Posts
23
Reaction score
0
Location
Vancouver, WA
Is there any anti freeze left in the block that you could do an SCA test on?

Not sure, but it might give you some piece of mind. Tested a junkyard 7.3 out of a '92- it looked real good. Seems like by '92 it should have been a fairly well known issue..??


There might be some still in the radiator, but it has been sitting outside. Will air exposure alter the test?
 

92F350CC

Ford Man
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Posts
3,479
Reaction score
15
Location
Las Vegas
I hear the CDR helps contribute to cavitation, so doing a road draft tube might help.
 

Kevin 007

Full-floater
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
1,966
Reaction score
245
Location
Nelson BC Canada
Cavitation and head gasket stress, as extra oil in thr back two cylinders = more heat = more stress. I hate CDR valves But if you keep em clean they usually work trouble free.
 

icanfixall

Official GMM hand model
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Posts
25,858
Reaction score
674
Location
West coast
A CDR valve does not contribute to cavitation. Funny fact about these 7.3 engines. The back cylinders on each side of the block are bored larger than the front 6. Its about 1/2 of a thousands but its differant. No machine shop will do that when they bore a 7.3 during a rebuild. Internationals reasoning was the angle the block sides causes the oil sucked into the intake will migrate to the rear cylinders creating more combustion heat. Sounds like some black magic engineering going on one late nite way back then. In those larger bored cylinders they still used the same size pistons...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
91,398
Posts
1,131,921
Members
24,216
Latest member
bob123456789
Top