Restrictor size for bypass oil filtration?

AcIdBuRn02ZTS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Posts
1,052
Reaction score
89
Location
Indiana
Hey guys...

Those of you running bypass filters, how large of an orifice does your filter head or restrictor fitting use? The filter head I'll be using doesn't have a restrictor and I don't want to be limited to certain filters.

The filter I'm using for now (or will be once plumbed) is a Fleetguard LF777 bypass filter. The filter does have a built in orifice but I believe it may be too large still.

I can purchase npt threaded restrictors from mcmaster-carr but being as they are $10 each.. I don't want to guess too many times.

I want enough restriction to keep from dropping oil pressure at hot idle, yet enough flow to be worth while.

Thanks
-Chris
 

AcIdBuRn02ZTS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Posts
1,052
Reaction score
89
Location
Indiana
I'm thinking around a .040 which should equate out to roughly 1qt per minute of flow which would filter the entire capacity of the engine every 13-14 minutes give or take... which from what I'm reading, is about right.
 

Thewespaul

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Posts
8,796
Reaction score
8,059
Location
Bulverde, Texas
What head are you using for the bypass filter head? I would get an oil pressure gauge and buy a few different sizes and use the largest one you can use without noticing a difference in oil pressure. Otherwise every setup is going to be different as far as what orifice will work.
 

AcIdBuRn02ZTS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Posts
1,052
Reaction score
89
Location
Indiana
I've got a mechanical gauge... using a Fleetguard filter and filter head.

I want to avoid buying multiple restrictors as they are $10 each... so just trying to see what others have used. I'm more then likely going with a .040 or .036
 

BrianX128

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2015
Posts
1,800
Reaction score
540
Location
Pittsburgh
I use a .060 restrictor and haven't noticed any loss of oil pressure. The thing I bought from jegs had a .040, .060, and if you didn't thread either of those in the fitting with an Alan key it left it as .080 or something I can't remember which.
 

AcIdBuRn02ZTS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Posts
1,052
Reaction score
89
Location
Indiana
Based on mcmaster-carr's website, @40psi, .060 would flow ~ .5gpm of water which oil has a correction ~1.05 meaning .525gpm.

I'm wanting to half that... get as close to 1qt per minute as I can.

In theory, the sweet spot will be around .038 which is where I'll start. Not worried about plugging it up as it will be on the return side of the filter head.

Anyways, thanks for the input.
 

icanfixall

Official GMM hand model
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Posts
25,858
Reaction score
673
Location
West coast
I suggest buying the smaller size restrictor. then if its too small drill it out till it meets with what you want. How hard will it be to fabricate your own restrictor to fit the opening in the bypass head.
 

AcIdBuRn02ZTS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Posts
1,052
Reaction score
89
Location
Indiana
Not sure of a fitting I could use to make my own. I know some drill pipe plugs for the restriction... but not sure how I'd put a pipe plug inline with the outlet and still have threads for the hose fittings...

I suppose one could take a steel pipe nipple and weld it solid... then drill it. I would worry about the weld eventually failing though.
 

AcIdBuRn02ZTS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Posts
1,052
Reaction score
89
Location
Indiana
Well... .036 is too small. Lol

It currently takes 3 minutes to flow 1/2qt of oil... way too slow considering the system now holds 14qts.

Will more then likely just step that up to 1/16 but doing some reading on it first.
 

AcIdBuRn02ZTS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Posts
1,052
Reaction score
89
Location
Indiana
I'm gonna post up over at BITOG and see what they say about the flow rate. It may be fine... just seems really slow. I know that the filter is substantially more efficient the slower the flow.. so that's not a bad thing.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
91,320
Posts
1,130,255
Members
24,127
Latest member
RustyNail351

Members online

Top