The question is why do you feel the need to go with a driveline brake instead of the factory setup?
http://www.tsmmfg.com/np205.html
my question is, why would you need one if you still have your stock drum setup on your rear? Those massive things should be able to hold some weight back!

As for not recommended for engine braking, i have a theory but i could just be blowing smoke.
you need to understand the engineering on how a GV works first. google up "laycock overdrive" to get educated.So the way this is working in my mind is you are using your truck to perform work on the engine, not your engine performing work on the truck. Your axle has a 4.10 ratio, GV has a .78 and your E4OD has .71. When applied backwards, your engine sees a 7.45:1 ratio trying to spin it, vs your engine trying to spin a 2.55 ratio.
I did the math backwards because your engine is now requiring work and uses vehicle intertia to spin it. so if your engine was 200 hp, and your exhaust brake is 60% efficient, you get 120hp worth of braking.
Your Gear vendors has to put up with a 4.10 ratio trying to spin it backwards againt it's own overdrive, which is acting like and underdrive now, at 1.22:1. a 22% increase in torque, which nets you a 5.25:1 ratio at the e4od output shaft. Along with the GV now trying to spin the e4od's overdrive, it's going to be doing some slippin'!
I imagined everything working backwards. axle ratio to GV ratio to E4OD ratio to the 120HP engine braking.
Anyone feel free to set me straight! If i'm wrong i want to figure this stuff out!
Well that takes care of the whole D80 swap behind a hand-shaker issue, thanks a bunch!
Ah, didn't see that yesterday when i was browsing thru their products. So by the looks of it the C6 units are out, but the 4R100 ones (part # 3D4R101 and 3D4R102, whatever the difference may be) sure look like they'd work well. Wonder why they need to know axle ratio and tire size though, I thought all GV units are geared the same internally?GV does sell a "motorhome" kit that makes more sense than hanging the OD off your tcase/trans. it appears to go in between a 4wd trans output housing and your factory driveline brake/tcase... so that means OD in 4wd if used with a bw1356. Then you can hang the brake off a tcase OR use an f-superduty brake.
Like i said in the other thread, PacBrake > GV any day. Especially in your application. You really want to avoid using any friction-based brakes you may have till last possible moment, that's why one should never follow a heavy-haul 18-wheeler too close - good drivers will have their rigs slowed down from interstate speeds down to 15-20 mph on jakes alone before the brake lamps ever come on in the back. A driveline brake is a good backup for the service brakes, but I still wouldn't wanna get to using it like that, ever! See what GV folks have to say about use of exhaust brakes, but considering the other limitations of their unit you may wanna keep an eye out for a US Gear or even better a Mitchell one.The idea of a drive line brake is just attractive to me as, within the recent GV thread i started, it was pointed out that trucks w/ GV may not be a good application for an exhaust brake. I still plan to call GV and talk to them about this but, with that being said, and my recent acquisition of knowledge of the F-superduty drive line brake, i wanted to inquire about it.
I have an exhaust brake and want to keep it, so we will see what GV has to say about engine- braking/exhaust-braking.
The drive line brake wouldnt be replacing the drum assembly it would be in addition too.
Im hauling trucks of the same and greater weight with a towbar and wish to keep as much wear and tear off of the standard braking system as possible.
you need to understand the engineering on how a GV works first. google up "laycock overdrive" to get educated.
This is meant to augment engine braking, going back to the other discussion.Really expensive, but you can get a electric driveline brake. Some firetrucks and stuff have them.
Uses electromagnetic forces.