moose power?

kas83

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Posts
596
Reaction score
8
Location
Plover, WI
Because that's lame.LOL I have actually talked to people who want to put the 7.3 heui system on a 6.9.cookoo

If you put the injector between the valves, you could correct the angle.

What part of converting a PSD over got misconstrued as HEUI? Converting an IDI to direct injection is basically making it a mechanical PSD. Custom injectors, fab work, parts etc, to change the entire way the engine operates, and puts it outside its design parameters. Also, the injector won't line up between the valves, not enough room. Mechanical PSD is way more feasible, and since you'd prolly use alot of parts designed around the PSD, why not just start with one.

In-direct injected is exactly that, direct injecting one turns it into a mechanical PSD imho. Guess I'm just a purist when it comes to these old mills.
 

racer30

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Posts
450
Reaction score
1
Location
western Oregon
Well I would think opening the precup port would help if you are turning up the fuel, I think a psd piston would work because the fuel/fire shot out of the precup would deflect off the resessed dome on the piston and move around the cumbustion area at the top. thoughts?
 

429idi

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Posts
209
Reaction score
0
Location
Layton Utah
What part of converting a PSD over got misconstrued as HEUI? Converting an IDI to direct injection is basically making it a mechanical PSD. Custom injectors, fab work, parts etc, to change the entire way the engine operates, and puts it outside its design parameters. Also, the injector won't line up between the valves, not enough room. Mechanical PSD is way more feasible, and since you'd prolly use alot of parts designed around the PSD, why not just start with one.

In-direct injected is exactly that, direct injecting one turns it into a mechanical PSD imho. Guess I'm just a purist when it comes to these old mills.

My point was just that there are crazier people than me.
 

429idi

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Posts
209
Reaction score
0
Location
Layton Utah
Also, I don't want to modify the stock head. I want to start from scratch, you can make room for the injector. 3208 injectors are a lot slimmer than idi's.
 

seawalkersee

It needs a turbo...
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Posts
1,467
Reaction score
1
Location
KCMO
Look at the pic. If you think that moving the stuff around will make that big of a difference, you may be missing something. In the event you can see it, the only thing that appears to be a better idea would be more of a spray atomization (someone PLEASE build some tips that do that).

Having a different injector in the head STILL has to go throught the precup. You can not get rid of that (in theory). I can go into how to do it, but again, that is in theory.

SWS

SWS
 

88 Ford

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Posts
1,784
Reaction score
6
Location
San Diego, CA
In my opinion, the problem with these motors is getting them to hold together at those higher horsepower levels. Using a Super Moose and the Moose injectors will get you enough fuel to the motor. Its just getting the motor to hold at the higher boost levels. If you convert it to DI my thought is that you will still run into these problems. :dunno
 

FordGuy100

Registered User
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Posts
8,749
Reaction score
282
Location
Silverton, OR
The bottom end on these IDI's is pretty bullet proof. Someone needs to post a link to the article with the 9 second IDI. Bottom end should hold the power no problem.

Remember 21.5:1 compression ratio requires a stout bottom end.
 

seawalkersee

It needs a turbo...
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Posts
1,467
Reaction score
1
Location
KCMO
I think you are overthinking "Bottom End". Remember, they used rubber freeze plugs because the block was twisting. So even with the bottom end that strong, there is still a weak point.

Went and checked over at powderstoke nation...man...that place is full of jerks. I understand the point of having an opinion, but the "lets go past that and just start making fun of people" attitude from people who may not even be able to change their own injectors is pretty hard to swallow for someone on the outside looking in. Jesus would not want it that way and I am choosing to stay away.

SWS
 

icanfixall

Official GMM hand model
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Posts
25,858
Reaction score
673
Location
West coast
I never venture from this site.... I'm not interested in other sites at this point....
 

429idi

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Posts
209
Reaction score
0
Location
Layton Utah
I never venture from this site.... I'm not interested in other sites at this point....

x2 on that

Wasn't that engine that had rubber freeze plugs making over 1000hp? I don't think making 400hp will kill these things, I mean, a stock 351 windsor can handle 500hp for hell sakes!
 

blown84

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Posts
164
Reaction score
0
Location
Conroe, TX, USA
so far i like this site. it has a very FTE feel to it. :)

so would i loose bottom end torque if i open up the precup for more fuel?
 

FordGuy100

Registered User
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Posts
8,749
Reaction score
282
Location
Silverton, OR
That's what I meant. Honesty if your trying for some
crazy numbers you might as well chose a platform that's sucedded in that area. I'm sure these bottom ends will handle 400hp fairly easily.
 

429idi

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Posts
209
Reaction score
0
Location
Layton Utah

Ya, I think that's the one. Is there any definitive proof of this build? I've heard stories, but all the figures seem to be off. I mean, it can't be making both 1200hp and 2000tq at 6000rpm. At 147lbs of boost at 6000 rpm even at iats or 300 degrees, it should be flowing enough air for around 3000hp, so if it only makes 1200 hp that's pretty gay. The only figure that seems right is 1200hp for 4500lbs ~ 9.something quarter mile.
 
Top