CFM is pretty easy to figure out, at least ball park.... Displacement per revolution (420/444 CI) times rpm/2 (4 stroke, so every cylinder fills once every other rev) and then convert to cfm (divide by 1728)
In reality there's also a factor for volumetric efficiency - accounting for the fact that each cylinder woln't completely fill. Typically 85% is a good number, so air flow would actually be roughly 85% of the above number.
At 3300 rpm this comes to 360/340 cfm for 6.9/7.3 respectively.
Now we factor in the turbo....
You know that flow into the cylinders is still roughly the same, since the cylinders are still filling the same amount at the same speed, so flow into the intake is roughly the same, just at a higher pressure, so more weight of air is squeezed into the same space, but the volume is the same.
Gas behavior can be modeled using the ideal gas law: p*v=n*r*t (remember physics class??) 'r' is a constant and 'n' is essentially the number of molecules of air which remains constant in this case. Assuming temperature remains constant (which it doesn't, but close enough) you get p*v=constant, so if you double the pressure (measured as absolute pressure, so 15 psi of boost is doubling the pressure) you half the volume. Or looking at it the other way around, making the same volumetric flow at double the pressure (15 psi boost) requires double the air flow at atmospheric pressure...
The short version of the above is that if you double the flow of an NA engine it's a decent ballpark for a turboed engine.
So figure around 700 cfm on the inlet side and you should be safe.
Mind you, this is very much a ballpark figure, but for the purposes of general planning it should be reasonable.