Macrobb
Full Access Member
To be fair, though, you can easily use the 'timing by ear' method to get a decent running truck; /far/ better than just "leaving it as it is". Sure, the pulse timing method is the "best"*, but it's better to do it by ear than just eyeball the marks and call it good.then timing by ear being the worst.
*Note:
I am good with saying that pulse timing is fine if you have a new IP.
If you have a worn out or sketchy IP, timing it "by the numbers" won't work right, due to the timing curves being off.
With an old IP, you basically have to just split the difference, mess around until you get the best of what you have, and call it good.
The number may not be anywhere near what it should be at 2K unloaded, but at least it will run decently, vs being "good" at 2K unloaded, but, say, being really advanced under load, or smoking white due to being really retarded.
Remember: IPs will /run/ for perhaps 200K, but after 100K they need replacement.
That 100-200K range is where things are nowhere near what they should be according to the book.
And, usually, when you buy an IDI these days, chances are that the IP is in that 100-200K range, because nobody wants to spend $600+ on a new IP for a truck that's only worth a couple of times that.