cranknrods
Full Access Member
some people with engines that dont have optic sensors(like the gm 6.5) have ran wmo blends as heavy as 100% the most i can get to run in my truck is 25%wmo and 75%wvo or diesel. any higher than this and i throw codes. i belive its because the optic sensor cant see through the fuel because the wmo makes it too thick. i have also found that 25%wmo/75%wvo blend works really well. i think the wvo gives me my idle quality back and the wmo gives me back my power that i loose from running just wvo (yes, i have noticed a difference)
i understand alot of people have a problem with using wmo as a fuel because of the emmisions. the emmisions really are not as bad as it may seem. however, lets try to keep this thread open for those that are using it in thier blends. wmo blended with wvo yeilds great results and i believe a thinner blend.
i think blends are a great way to get to work and i would like to know what you guys have ran and the results you got from certain blends. please include the engine it was ran through also. the type of injection it had wouldnt hurt either. im trying to start a knowledge base for us blend'ers and not all blenders are going to know that your 98.5' cummins is electronic injected but your 98 cummins isn'.t
OPEC
i understand alot of people have a problem with using wmo as a fuel because of the emmisions. the emmisions really are not as bad as it may seem. however, lets try to keep this thread open for those that are using it in thier blends. wmo blended with wvo yeilds great results and i believe a thinner blend.
i think blends are a great way to get to work and i would like to know what you guys have ran and the results you got from certain blends. please include the engine it was ran through also. the type of injection it had wouldnt hurt either. im trying to start a knowledge base for us blend'ers and not all blenders are going to know that your 98.5' cummins is electronic injected but your 98 cummins isn'.t
OPEC