sle2115
NRA LIFE MEMBER
One of the other issues and reasons that this nets such gains on a race engine is RPM and windage. By keeping a negative pressure on the crankcase of an engine spinning 7-9000 RPM's, windage is reduced...windage screens are used as well as crank wipers to keep the "stirring" of oil to a minimum on these apps. While I'm guessing our cranks prolly stir the oil, the net result on an engine turning 3500 RPM would be much less than one turning 2 to 3 times that. That's not to say that evacuating blow-by might not be a good idea.
Since diesels in general don't make much intake vacuum (open intake plenum versus a throttle plate on a gasser) I don't think plumbing directly into the intake would do much unless it's done in a way that air flowing over the "port" would cause vacuum such as the angle cut crankcase evac system plumbed into the exhaust where the flow of exhaust causes a low pressure as it flows over the pipe, thus creating vacuum.
Also keep in mind that a positive crankcase evacuation is as much a form of emissions control on a gasser as it is to benefit the engine. They would rather draw the vapor into the intake and run it through the combustion process than vent to atmosphere as they did in the old days. Anyone else familiar with the old V8 SBC engines and the "slobber tube" system they used to use? It was a slant cut pipe that ran from the intake valley to down just below the engine, as the car moved down the road, the air flowing under the car created the same negative pressure as the pipe in the exhaust, thus producing postive crankcase evacuation.
Since diesels in general don't make much intake vacuum (open intake plenum versus a throttle plate on a gasser) I don't think plumbing directly into the intake would do much unless it's done in a way that air flowing over the "port" would cause vacuum such as the angle cut crankcase evac system plumbed into the exhaust where the flow of exhaust causes a low pressure as it flows over the pipe, thus creating vacuum.
Also keep in mind that a positive crankcase evacuation is as much a form of emissions control on a gasser as it is to benefit the engine. They would rather draw the vapor into the intake and run it through the combustion process than vent to atmosphere as they did in the old days. Anyone else familiar with the old V8 SBC engines and the "slobber tube" system they used to use? It was a slant cut pipe that ran from the intake valley to down just below the engine, as the car moved down the road, the air flowing under the car created the same negative pressure as the pipe in the exhaust, thus producing postive crankcase evacuation.