david85
Full Access Member
Why shave the pistons, how close do they come to the crank, if it would fit then I would think that shorter connecting rods would be the way to go. For lower compression, and you would keep the strength of the piston.
Its cheaper to cut pistons down than to have them or conrods made up from scratch. Flatlander ended up learning a few lessons the hard way for the rest of us and from what I know he cut off more than anyone else.
I would also start to wonder how dropping the top flat part of the piston down will start to effect combustion efficiency. Maybe a custom piston with a deeper prechamber dish would be a better option?
Of course, if you lower the top of the piston down, it would allow for slightly more valve lift.
In the case of the turbo diesel that some rangers had, the prechamber was actually shaped so it doubled as valve reliefs. That 2.3L engine actually has a larger prechamber dish in the piston than on a 6.9/7.3. I wonder if such a custom piston could be made to drop compression, increase valve lift and all without changing any of the key rotating/reciprocating parts. Would make for a pretty big wide on the piston, but could it work?