I just measured my fathers powerstroke today at 44" from bellhousing to front of radiator. Now assuming that that is true for the IDI I will next get the length of the early Bronco engine compartment.
Then I would have the t-19 bolted up to a heavy duty t-case that it fits. I guess I would have to cut out the inner fenders and core support just to get air in there! The standard Bronco coils are not thick enough of wire so I would need mabe something off a havy tuck with coils (real thick).
It looks like I will need 40" from the fire wall to the front of the radiator to fie an IDI into the Early Bronco engine bay. I will go research the Early Bronco engine compartment.
I may buy an Early Bronco and would try to get a 7.3 in it. Any reasons not to? I would cut the inner fenders some so I could get to the exaust. Bolt the T-19 up to the dana 20 and adapter. Iunderstand that all adapters between the tranny and t-case on stock fords have the same bolt pattern on...
I am considering running 1 ton axils full width under my scout (same width as an early bronco) and comparing the fuel econmy to a full size like 1979 Bronco or F-350 for miles per gallon. I know that the tires sticking out create drag but is it more than on a ful size truck where the tires are...
Just an idea that I have never seen propesed!
I have a '82 f-150 and I was thinking it is a good set up needing a little tweaking. I get 6-11 mpg running from 1300-3000 rpm and a 50 mph cruise at 2400 rpm. I was thinking that max torqueat 2300 rpm is too high and I do not care that it makes 200...
Yesterday, 08:30 PM #1
hugeredford
Registered User
hugeredford you said:
my dads 16000 pound freightliner w a 365 cat gets 12 mpg bobtail. Why can't pickup truck manufacturers make their trucks get better milage. Also I was wondering what kind of mpg your idi's were getting...
That is just spectacular! I get 6 in my 1982 F-150 with a 351 W 2 barrel, short duration valve timeing, restricted breathing and 2.25" singel exaust. It has 4.11 gears with a stock c6. I have seen as high as 15 keeping my rpms below 2500 rpm and peak torque feals to be 2200-2300 rpm.
I...
I can learn as much about it as I want once I own a high performance pump! Until I own rights to my own Kens injector pump then I do not have much right to the knollege.
If I can get 242 hp at 2700 rpm and 541 ft/lbs of torque at 1500 rpm from a $525 pump and open exaust, intercooled, 12-16...
I am going this rout so I can get performance in a truck without getting 5 mpgs, and more like 12-20 range!
I am still working on getting into th DPS forum though. I am a member but I can not participate in threads.
I just know of the 338 ft/lbs of torque at 1500 and 180 hp at 3000 rpm stock. I have heard of a man named Ken who distributes hot pumps for $525 to spit out more fuel along with turbos. I am more intersted in tuning for seat of the pants and good around runner. I do not care about hp- just good...
HALLMAN PRO KIT:
Our new Hallman Pro kit contains our new Hallman Pro valve. The new Pro valve is machined out of billet aluminum and stainless steel pieces. The new design of the valve incorporates some great new features not currently available on any other manual boost controller.
We...
I hear alot about poeple breaking trannies with diesels. What is that at about 700 ft/lbs of torque? A freind told me that the NP 435 and the T-18 and ZF 5 speed are good for about 550 ft/lbs of toruqe and once you hit the 600 ft/lbs range you need a T-19 or a C6. What do you do when you hit 800...
I am looking at a 7.3 L diesel for my 4x4 scout. I will buy a junk yard engine and tranny and do not want to break my tranny if I turbo the motor. WHat is thought bout these two trannys. I think 4 speeds is enough but If the ZF is stronger which I don't think then mabe I should run one.
thanks...
I think so too, but couldn't you run more boost at higher altitued such as 7000 feet copared to sea level to gain back the lost power?
Actually I was 4 wheeling in Big bear with my cousin in his jeep and he said that his jeep ran better up there than back at his home in Palm Springs; more...
I may throw mine out if I found a better rig and the price was right.
Here is mine
IMG_2742
IMG_2741
IMG_2746
IMG_2747
IMG_2748
IMG_2756
IMG_2757
IMG_2758
IMG_2776
nasty windsor smogger!
IMG_2762
I mean't 15 psi of manafold pressure, the book siad that the less air density the lowere you manafold pressure is. Mabe it is valuble to get a manafold pressure gague and see how the pressure changes as I gain altitude.
I was reading a turbo charger book and under the High altitude section; Read only if interested as I am very much a novice at the turbo and this is out of a published book; Turbo chargers by Hugh Machines.
High altitude turbo charging.
A naturally aspirated engine will...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.