Anybody tried DIESEL HPR in their IDI?

bbjordan

Snow Monkey
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Posts
1,421
Reaction score
393
Location
Ashern Manitoba
A little bit of organic chemistry.

They sure want to distance themselves from "biodiesel", but they say it is made from animal fat. Hmmm...animals are not bio?
So it would appear that they start with animal fat or stearic acid and create a stearic ester.

The acid CH3(CH2)16COOH is called octadecanoic acid, but the old name is still commonly used. This is stearic acid. Starts like this:

You must be registered for see images attach


The red part gets removed and a Methanol or an Ethanol group gets added in its place. And winds up looking like this:

You must be registered for see images attach


Compare to diesel:

You must be registered for see images attach


Ok, so what about biodiesel? Well biodiesel covers a wide range of Methyl Esters usually from oil seeds like soybeans or canola.
The main fatty acids in the oils are oleic (56.80-64.92%), linoleic (17.11-20.92%) and palmitic (4.18-5.01%) acids. They start out like this:
Oleic acid
You must be registered for see images attach


Linoleic acid
You must be registered for see images attach


Palmitic acid
You must be registered for see images attach


As you can see they are similar, but different. The stearic ester is saturated (all the middle carbon bonds have hydrogens). Oleic ester is monounsaturate (it has one double carbon bond). Linoleic ester is a polyunsaturate ( it has more than one double carbon bond). Clear as mud now?

In the end, as fuel, they are all esters. Esters eat rubber. You may want to put a return cap o-ring or two in a jar of HPR and see what happens to them.

With a cetane rating of 75 you will probably want to retard your timing a bit to take full advantage of that. I noticed when I was running biodiesel with a cetane rating of 60 I had to retard the timing. I even disconnected the Cold Advance Solenoid because the engine just rattled too much!

You could try a 20% mix of HPR to #2 diesel and see how it goes...
 

Koch13351

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Posts
310
Reaction score
39
Location
SoCal
I started a thread concerning this "Diesel HPR" last fall I think. I have run at least a dozen tanks of it in my truck, and I highly recommend using it, or at least trying it. It really smooths out the engine, and causes a very noticeable change in engine tone, being significantly quieter. I never did get around to doing an MPG comparison. I got slightly less black smoke from the exhaust on acceleration, and my cold idle haze was significantly reduced. Also, having a poor functioning glow plug system at the time, I did get noticibly easier starts. If it's available near you, I wouldn't hesitate to give it a try. I don't happen to have a Diesel HPR pump located close enough to me to be convenient to constantly use it, but I do top off with it whenever one is along my route.
 

laserjock

Almost there...
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Posts
8,841
Reaction score
3,130
Location
Maryland
They sure want to distance themselves from "biodiesel", but they say it is made from animal fat. Hmmm...animals are not bio?
So it would appear that they start with animal fat or stearic acid and create a stearic ester.

The acid CH3(CH2)16COOH is called octadecanoic acid, but the old name is still commonly used. This is stearic acid. Starts like this:

You must be registered for see images attach


The red part gets removed and a Methanol or an Ethanol group gets added in its place. And winds up looking like this:

You must be registered for see images attach


Compare to diesel:

You must be registered for see images attach


Ok, so what about biodiesel? Well biodiesel covers a wide range of Methyl Esters usually from oil seeds like soybeans or canola.
The main fatty acids in the oils are oleic (56.80-64.92%), linoleic (17.11-20.92%) and palmitic (4.18-5.01%) acids. They start out like this:
Oleic acid
You must be registered for see images attach


Linoleic acid
You must be registered for see images attach


Palmitic acid
You must be registered for see images attach


As you can see they are similar, but different. The stearic ester is saturated (all the middle carbon bonds have hydrogens). Oleic ester is monounsaturate (it has one double carbon bond). Linoleic ester is a polyunsaturate ( it has more than one double carbon bond). Clear as mud now?

In the end, as fuel, they are all esters. Esters eat rubber. You may want to put a return cap o-ring or two in a jar of HPR and see what happens to them.

With a cetane rating of 75 you will probably want to retard your timing a bit to take full advantage of that. I noticed when I was running biodiesel with a cetane rating of 60 I had to retard the timing. I even disconnected the Cold Advance Solenoid because the engine just rattled too much!

You could try a 20% mix of HPR to #2 diesel and see how it goes...

Good description. The process is also known as saponification which as you probably guessed is how early soap was made. The only real reason to run the esterified fuel as opposed to the triglyceride is simply flow. The trigs cloud up much sooner than the free esters. There can also be mixing issues with #2 which is why most places will sell up to B20 and then jump to B100.
 

hesutton

The Anti-Anderson
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
8,200
Reaction score
738
Location
Bowling Green, KY
Fuel from Palm oil... PALM OIL..... seriously???

This is what California thinks is better for the environment? Really? I swear, I grow less and less fond of California all the time.

Does anyone in the state government pushing for HPR have a clue of the very real impact that palm oil plantations have on the environment they are pretending to try and save? I'm no tree hugger and rarely give most of the BS spewing from eco - ****'s a passing glance... But, palm oil plantations are one of the biggest causes of man made deforestation and habitat loss. But, screw it.... that's Indonesia or Malaysia right? Not sunny California. LOL Just robbing Peter to pay Paul. The hypocrisy is laughable.

Heath
 

laserjock

Almost there...
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Posts
8,841
Reaction score
3,130
Location
Maryland
The hpr is animal fat not the plant oils I believe. The thing that has intrigued me has been algae as an oil source. It's not a food product so much so unlike ethanol from corn (which is stupid) it doesn't tie fuel to food supply. That is a recipe for disaster.

I absolutely agree with you that most people don't realize that all that's happening with most of these alternatives are robbing Peter to pay Paul. I actually was looking into setting up an algae reactor as a side project with thoughts of eventually scaling up but alternative liquid fuel seems to not be a priority with #2 at $2 a gallon.
 

hesutton

The Anti-Anderson
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
8,200
Reaction score
738
Location
Bowling Green, KY
They use some slaughter house waste, but, the majority is produced from vegetable oil (rapes and palm). Reading Neste's literature, they certainly use, and from what I read, prefer the properties of the fuel produced from palm oil.

I haven't read anywhere that HPR diesel is produced exclusively from animal waste, nor have I read anywhere that HPR is never produced from palm oil.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying using/buying/liking HPR is horrible or anything.

It's just.... in my opinion..... the idiocracy of praising a fuel as an environment saving wonder while making the same fuel with a product that destroys millions of acres of forest annually is a joke.

Heath
 
Last edited:

mblaney

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Posts
1,119
Reaction score
371
Location
Ottawa/Ont/Canada
So HPR is a Soylent Green for our trucks??? :rotflmao

The good thing about testing and promoting alternative products (fuel sources, electrical power...) is that it promotes research and development. The R&D will hopefully result in 'more renewable' resources. Similar to solar panels and wind mills - they are not the solution but as technology evolves maybe they will.
 

bbjordan

Snow Monkey
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Posts
1,421
Reaction score
393
Location
Ashern Manitoba
It's people!

It's just.... in my opinion..... the idiocracy of praising a fuel as an environment saving wonder while making the same fuel with a product that destroys millions of acres of forest annually is a joke.

I totally agree with you on that Heath!

So HPR is a Soylent Green for our trucks??? :rotflmao

Ha Ha Ha! That crossed my mind, but I decided not to go there when I posted. LOL
 

idi_econoline

No Bed For Me!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Posts
928
Reaction score
32
Location
Northern California
On my second tank of HPR at the moment. And having occasional surging and power loss, which may not be related...... Just changed the fuel filter, and the contents were nice and clear.

Only difference this time is that I added Stanadyne Lubricity formula on this second tank.

Runs smoother and cleaner otherwise, but will probably go back to dino from now on.
 

DaytonaBill

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
May 5, 2008
Posts
503
Reaction score
15
Location
USA
They sure want to distance themselves from "biodiesel", but they say it is made from animal fat. Hmmm...animals are not bio?
So it would appear that they start with animal fat or stearic acid and create a stearic ester.
Well, I see a problem with that, bbjordan...

In post #11, the manufacturer says that it is mostly palm oil...

no mention of animal fat...

Sorry, not meaning to be confrontational...:dunno
 

bbjordan

Snow Monkey
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Posts
1,421
Reaction score
393
Location
Ashern Manitoba
DaytonaBill, you are 100% correct!

After reading the neste-renewable-diesel-handbook.pdf, I understand two things now:

1. The primary source is currently Palm Oil.
2. The process used to make the HPR is totally different than the Esterification process I attempted to explain above. HPR process result is an Alkane, not an Ester. The process is explained beautifully in Fig. 1 on page 4 of the Handbook. Gotta love colour coding! :)

As such, it should behave pretty much as Diesel, only better (except for energy density) as it would be more pure since it is synthesized from a consistent base stock. #2 Diesel is a longer carbon chain molecule, which gives it a higher energy density. It also makes it burn more slowly (lower cetane rating). The more carbon atoms in the chain, the dirtier it burns.

The Handbook claims the process is more energy efficient than the Esterification process. I'm sold. IMHO this is future, making synthetic fuel from natural gas and organic feedstocks. It's just a better process.

Confrontational? No. Thank you for forcing me to do my home work and read the Handbook. :D I am now wiser. :cheers:
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
91,344
Posts
1,130,699
Members
24,142
Latest member
Cv axle

Staff online

Top