air filter mod

Diesel_brad

Dunce
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Posts
6,099
Reaction score
4
Location
gilbert pa
I dont know if this has been covered before but..... Here it goes.

As some of you may know i am highly dissapointed in the lack of performance my 86 6.9 has to offer. So today i called my local IDI/powerstoke/diesel GURU. He used to haul cars(3) and oversized loads w his 86 6.9 when the truck was new. He was so heavy most of the time he added a tag axle to help take the weight, He now works as a mechanic at a local diesel shop/used diesel truck lot.

Anyway he is the one who put in my 7.3 glow plug harness in my 86 so it would start. (only took him one hour)

So i called him today to ask him if he had any pointers on how to get any performance out of my truck, besides a turbo.
HE first figured i was not getting enough fuel till i told him i have smoke under a load. Then he knew i was not getting enough air.. He reccomended i take the air cleaner assem off and remove the restrictive bottom. here are the pics
The restrictor plate
You must be registered for see images attach

The air cleaner w the restricter plate
You must be registered for see images attach



The initial hole was only 2.5" now it is 5.5". I also took the snorkle off that goes down to the rad support.
:eek:During my test drive i couldnt belive it. The truck actually got up an ran!;Sweet And now i had no smoke under a load.So i came home and turned up the pump one flat. I went for another ride, this time i had smoke , but not alot, just a lil more than i did before i started. But the fuel adjustment also helped in the performance department.

I hope this helps someone in the eternal search for free/cheep mods
 
Last edited:

dyoung14

Is getting worn out
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Posts
6,128
Reaction score
3
Location
spencer,tn
im guessing your truck came factory without the soup bowl the trucks without the soup bowl from factory has the restrictor thing your talking about that will greatly cut down on power another thing that would help you is if you make a ram-air intake to force some air into the thing thats also another cheap mod to gain power, and do something to your exaust and then you should be able to turn your fuel up more

With my mods i was able to turn my fuel up 2 flats and could just hit 1250 at the top of the mountain towing a full size chevy truck and im n/a with my foot burried in the floor in second gear at 38 mph, but i turned it down some to keep the other people who drive my truck from being able to burn it up cause they dont watch the gauge:eek:,
 

PwrSmoke

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Posts
807
Reaction score
22
Location
Northwest Ohio
Don't simply remove the snorkel and let the engine breathe hot air. Hot air costs power, probably as much as you gain (if, big IF, you gain anything) by removing the snorkel. If you remove it, replace it with something that flows better and brings in cooler air. On an NA engine, you loose a handful of HP for every 10 degrees above 90F the air gets.

I have not flow benched an NA IDI air filter or snorkel, but I did do the system on my F150 5.4L for an article and have done about 10 other systems over the years with similar results. On my F150, the stock system flowed way more than the engine needed in stock tune but the biggest restriction was the filter element itself. One of the more popular shadetree modifications to the 5.4L intake was also tested on the flow bench and it made very little difference in airflow. Going to an aftermarket intake made a big difference in airflow but didn't make a huge difference in power output to an otherwise stock engine when tested on a dyno. The equation changes when you increase the power output by other means, (new tune, head work, pump mods, exhaust mods, etc.), which then increases airflow requirements, and the stock system may not have enough airflow capability me meet those demands and it begins to restrict power. On an otherwise stock engine, intake mods seldom add much power unless the stock system was really poorly designed (often true in the olds days, less true today). I've seen it many times on the dyno, testing free-flow filters and intake systems on stock trucks. On a chassis dyno, any gains are pretty hard to find over the normal noise and inaccuracies and if they're there at all, they are in the upper rpm range. Have seen more and better results more on engine dyno, where you can reliably see and reproduce a 5 hp gain. For most trucks and chassis dynos, my opinion is the margin for testing error is 10 hp plus or minus and I don't go dancing for joy if any gains show up under that margin. Especially if they can't be almost exactly repeated a MINIMUM of three times. In other words, don't hold up any chassis dyno testing you see as gospel unless you KNOW the test methodology. Anything recent I've ever mentioned or written about meets that standard.

The moral here is that once an engine has enough airflow to match the power output, giving it the POTENTIAL for more doesn't increase power. It needs what it needs at a particular power level, plus a little extra to account for air filter restriction due to dirt loading. This holds true all the way thru the rpm range. Restriction will cost more power at the upper rpm range. From the OE persecutive, they know most people aren't going to run their 6.9L at 3300 very often, so if the filter is restrictive from 2800 to 3300, they don't care much if the more restrictive (and quieter) system is less expensive to produce and easier to fit under the hood.

You can test this at home with a restriction gauge. Google Filter Minder. It a relatively inexpensive device (basically a recording vacuum gauge) that measures and records intake restriction. It's designed to tell you the best time to replace an air filter (which should be based on restriction, not some arbitrary mileage number). Install one with the widest range of numbers, 5-25 inches of mercury would be a good choice, or 5-20. Install it along with a new air filter and do some WOT runs up to redline. Observe the recorded restriction. If it's 10 inches or less, you gain very little by spending a lot of money to bring it down. If it's above 10 and you want to play, make whatever changes you think appropriate, reset the gauge and try again, working towards getting it as low as possible or as low as possible for the amount of money you want to spend. If it's a lot over 10, you are pretty much guaranteed a power boost by bringing it down. Start with the easy stuff... the filter element. I have discovered, for example, that certain low-rent, no-name air filters are highly restrictive versus an OE replacement or a good brand name. I know some of you have orange, but FRAM is at the forefront of air filters and makes some nice air filter elements.

FYI, on my Gen 1 Banks turbo system, complete with a K&N air filter (I do not like oiled cotton gauze for a filtering efficiency standpoint, but there is no drop in alternative), my engine will generate about 14 inches of restriction at redline, full-load power with a perfectly clean filter, or with the filter element removed. That shows me whatever restriction there is in the housing not the element. That restriction comes with a boost pressure of around 12-14 (a little higher than 10 10 psi Banks avertized), a fairly mild fuel rate setting on what amounts to a turbo-spec pump and a 4-inch exhaust (which will be replaced by a 3-inch when I can because it doesn't make more power, just more noise).

One thing specific to our engines, unlike electronically controlled diesels (and EFI gassers) which can change fuel delivery to suit available airflow, the mechanically injected engine is numb to airflow. It squirts a preset amount of fuel no matter what and responds to only two inputs, RPM and the position of the foot feed(maybe fuel inlet pressure too but it's not really designed for that to be an "input"). If there isn't enough air for that fuel.. the pump says "tough maracas" continues along the same path and the engine simply blows smoke and loses power. So, if any engine responds well to a reduction of intake restriction, it would be ours, but it remains to be proven to me what exactly works and is beneficial. I am largely skeptical because in the cases where I have tested "common knowledge," especially when it come to shadetree mods, I was usually underwhelmed with the results when the mod was tested objectively. But, you never know and I keep an open mind.
 

dunk

Dunce
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Posts
991
Reaction score
4
Location
NJ
Leave the air hose to pull cooler air. Like Jim says it can make a noticeable difference. Mine has an early Banks and I noticed an improvement when I put the cool air hose to that intake by the rad support. It has a reasonable open area and should not be restrictive. I recall reading somewhere someone put a temp sensor in the air filter housing and ran with and without the cool air intake hooked up and though I forget the numbers it was a large difference in air temp at the filter... On the order of tens of degrees.

There is also a cowl intake kit which I think would work at least as well and clean up the engine bay a bit vs the factory setup. Eventually I'd prefer to run a cowl intake but that'll be after trans swap and turbo upgrade so everything is how I want it before changing plumbing around.
 

Leeland

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Posts
951
Reaction score
84
Location
Oregon
Either of you two bother to check the date on this thread?
 

79jasper

Chickenhawk
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Posts
17,367
Reaction score
1,930
Location
Collinsville, Oklahoma
Lol. Who does that anymore.
The op seems to have been banned. I think he's moved on to powerstrokes now. At least i think I've seen him around some psd forums.

Sent from my SM-T537R4 using Tapatalk
 

PwrSmoke

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Posts
807
Reaction score
22
Location
Northwest Ohio
2009... yeah I missed that but how did it make it to the front of the post line? Anyway, I never miss a chance to pontificate ( : < ).
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
91,304
Posts
1,129,983
Members
24,111
Latest member
Lance

Members online

Top