heater hose question

trugertha1

Full Access Member
Joined
May 19, 2009
Posts
114
Reaction score
0
Location
Summerland BC
hey all i recently got a rad from a 86 6.9 4spd, and i was gunna install it into my 91 auto, my question is theres a heater hose right beside my lower rad hose, it just goes up and T's into the hose going from the block to the heater. can i just not use this hose? or is it important that stays hooked up like this?
thanx
 

defecater

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Posts
102
Reaction score
0
Location
Osceola, Iowa
I was going to ask pretty much the same question. I am wanting to remove the heater hose type heater and put in a block heater, and I am not shure how I should run the hoses--- Which one should I block off??? I am thinking the radiator fitting, am I wrong??
 

typ4

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Posts
9,109
Reaction score
1,395
Location
Newberg,OR
you can block the one in the radiator bottom tank. It is a fast warm up thing that isnt really needed.
 

LCAM-01XA

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Posts
5,932
Reaction score
12
Location
my very own hell
Agreed, you can lose that hose - it's part of the factory tow-package setup and all it does is help warm up the trans fluid faster when starting off cold. That 5/8" fitting down there is actually for the most part solid, the hole through it is only like 3/16" in diameter, so there is very little coolant flow through it. I just bypassed mine last week, engine works just fine without it.
 

MIDNIGHT RIDER

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Posts
4,639
Reaction score
38
I am wanting to remove the heater hose type heater and put in a block heater,


If the canister-heater is properly mounted near the bottom of the radiator, and that restrictive hose-fitting replaced with a normal one, the canister will out-perform any block-heater you will find; that is providing the canister-heater is properly plumbed and not just stuck in a heater-hose as an after-thought.;Sweet
 

Agnem

Using the Force!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
17,067
Reaction score
374
Location
Delta, PA
Did your manual trans rad have the fittings for your automatic trans to attach? I know they all seem to now, but didn't know if it was universal back then.
 

trugertha1

Full Access Member
Joined
May 19, 2009
Posts
114
Reaction score
0
Location
Summerland BC
Did your manual trans rad have the fittings for your automatic trans to attach? I know they all seem to now, but didn't know if it was universal back then.

no sir just upper and lower hose and drain plug. while having a look this morning i noticed that someone had added a trans cooler*12"x12"* but also left it plumbed to the trans cooler in the rad (old rad)? will this 12"x12" cooler be enough to cool my trans? or should i upgrade? thanx agian
 

icanfixall

Official GMM hand model
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Posts
25,858
Reaction score
673
Location
West coast
That lower radiator fitting is just as posted. I can add this... The brass fitting in the passenger head that sends hot coolant to the heater has an orfice in it too but... Ford no longer sells them. I bought the last fitting Ford had about 2 years ago. I found my orfice was shot and wanted a new fitting. National search said the only fitting still avaiaable was about 5 miles from me so I bought it. Looking back it was not really needed but I am running it now. I have no idea why the heater needs to have a restricted folw but thats what I found out. Geez... My heater will run you out of the truck on full hot position so I usually run it at half position. Must be because we never see any temps below freezeing out here on thww west coast like some areas well below freezeing....
 

LCAM-01XA

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Posts
5,932
Reaction score
12
Location
my very own hell
Gary, the head fitting in my engine was a full-bore one, not the restrictive orifice type. My truck also heats up the cab super good, last year we had one bad storm where I had torun the heat on full blast to keep the windshield from freezing over, and so I don't cook my ass in the process I ran with the slider window open... and I was wearing a T-shirt.

Oh yeah, for those with bolt-action transmissions, and slushbox-type radiators - that trans cooler in the bottom rad tank makes for a very nice fuel heater ;)
 

MIDNIGHT RIDER

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Posts
4,639
Reaction score
38
Oh yeah, for those with bolt-action transmissions, and slushbox-type radiators - that trans cooler in the bottom rad tank makes for a very nice fuel heater ;)



I am gonna have to re-examine my new replacement radiator, as I believe it has the cooler built in.

If so, I just might try this fuel-heater trick; I really don't know why, though, as I have never noticed any issues from running cold fuel.:dunno
 

sassyrel

Registered User
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Posts
3,714
Reaction score
1
Location
iowa
the reason for the restricted fitting, was more on cars than trucks. when you wound up the engine to good r's, the flow was so strong--it would blow heater cores apart. serious. this started to show in cop cars first!!!!!:D than was added to the other vehicles. as stated---i doubt it would bother on our diesel engines, as they dont spin that tight--
 

LCAM-01XA

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Posts
5,932
Reaction score
12
Location
my very own hell
I am gonna have to re-examine my new replacement radiator, as I believe it has the cooler built in.

If so, I just might try this fuel-heater trick; I really don't know why, though, as I have never noticed any issues from running cold fuel.:dunno

Well I figured that cold fuel hitting the hot fuel pump can't be good for the rubber diaphragm inside, now with the heater the fuel warms up to about the same temperature as the fuel pump so much less of a thermal shock for the diaphragm.

the reason for the restricted fitting, was more on cars than trucks. when you wound up the engine to good r's, the flow was so strong--it would blow heater cores apart. serious. this started to show in cop cars first!!!!!:D than was added to the other vehicles. as stated---i doubt it would bother on our diesel engines, as they dont spin that tight--

Oh, I know why they put the fitting in there, I blew the core in my Chev twice, both times racing some quite in a convertible. My Lincoln never blew a core tho, which is very very good - with the Chev it takes 15-20 minutes to change the core, and my Ford now is even easier, but with the Lincoln you spend good 6 hours just disassembling the dash so you can get to the core... nightmare!
 

MIDNIGHT RIDER

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Posts
4,639
Reaction score
38
Well I figured that cold fuel hitting the hot fuel pump can't be good for the rubber diaphragm inside, now with the heater the fuel warms up to about the same temperature as the fuel pump so much less of a thermal shock for the diaphragm.

Good point.

I hadn't considered it from that angle.

Now I am for certain gonna check out my radiator.



Oh, I know why they put the fitting in there, I blew the core in my Chev twice, both times racing some quite in a convertible. My Lincoln never blew a core tho, which is very very good - with the Chev it takes 15-20 minutes to change the core, and my Ford now is even easier, but with the Lincoln you spend good 6 hours just disassembling the dash so you can get to the core... nightmare!

From what I read, the "1st Gen." Dodge trucks require the A/C be evacuated and the evaporator be removed before you can even begin to get at the heater-core.

If the one on the wife's Dodge ever starts leaking, I am gonna bypass the core completely and install one of those self-contained heater/blowers, either under the dash or under the seat; no way am I gonna mess with her A/C after we spent more getting it up and freezing than we paid for the whole truck.:eek:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
91,344
Posts
1,130,706
Members
24,143
Latest member
Cv axle

Members online

Top