KW.......................
I really get a chuckle out of your "well informed" posts regarding Detroit Diesel engines.
I have never operated one for a living so I guess I'm really not qualified to
question your vast knowledge.
I did however spend the better part of 14 years "operating" ON them
Both on hiway and marine, off road as a field tech for Detroit Diesel.
I was with them from'76/'90.
In the end Detoits are really no worse than the Cumminz, Cats. They all share thier own quirks.
I will say that the 2 stroke was not the most powerful over the road, altho I have built some 8V-92's {pre computerised} that put down quite respectable hp #'s on the rollers....575 wheel HP :smoke
Off road in excavation the abilty of the 2 stroke's quick throttle response
was excellent in live boom draglines and cranes.
Detroits shined in marine with the best weight/ hp vs fuel consumption and
they are legendary in the gen set market where the constant rpm of either 1200 or 1800 turns allowed them to reach efficient cyl temps while under load
that yeilded excellent fuel economy.
Current day, however is another chapter as the 2 stroke has gone bye-bye in favor of 4 stroke computerised technology and I'm just defending what I know to be true of the engines that are being bashed here.
I suppose that even with my history bending wrenches on them , I'm just ignorant as to just how bad they are your real world
I guess now you will get your neighbors/uncles/ex-father in law who works in a truck shop to put me in my place
You kill me KW...er Pacifier...er Pacific ;p
gawd, did I just reply to a post from KW