Thanks all for the info.
The reason I bring gapless rings up, I've heard they keep the oil cleaner, but if they don't last as long...????
I'm sure there are many on the OB that have rebuilt engines with regular rings and have "clean" oil.
Another question on rebuilding, do steel cylinder sleeves reduce friction on the rings???
Thought I read it somewhere that steel gives less drag then cast iron...???
Ok lets slow down the this is better than that cause I got told this by that guy thing and deal with what is evidence not hear say.
I'm not wanting to see this thread go down hill I've rather enjoyed this thread.
Now with that being said lets go back to the question here about sleeves and reducing friction on rings.
Now don't quote me, however if I remember correctly, there are three different hardness of sleeves available for our engines.
That being said, the differences are for matching up to rings and providing the longest and best engine one can...now this is just going off my memory for researching sleeves. Please do your own research and draw your own conclusions do not base your choices on my memory.
As for GAPLESS rings, they have a purpose and place just as any other specialized part does.
Lets look at this for the sake of auto manufacturers first. The simple gapped ring is inexpensive, simple to install and reliable for many hours/miles of use. Why fix what isn't broken? Why increase cost not only to manufacturing but to consumers for a moderate gain at best to the general public.
Now take a look at a more specialized clientele, say you me and joe going to build a performance engine dude...
NA engines, well they are just that...NA no big deal right blue print the engine pick the best ring for the purpose, again here we can make choices more refined...be it cast or plasma moly spray faced etc.
Forced induction, hmm...now we have a vent in the rings gap that allows pressure to not be sealed and subsequent loss of power and increased contamination of oil. Perhaps now it's time to look at Gapless rings and there are more than one type of rings BTW. They don't increase drag, they do increase seal, you can go from...for example 7-10% leak down to damn near 1% leak down with a gapless...that's 1% loss of cylinder pressure compared to 10% on new engine that is broke in.
So if your new engine is giving and this is an example 450lbs cranking compression on a compression test, that is inclusive of 10% loss of seal, what would that equate to? I"m not good at math here so help me out but I think its 500 lbs compression...so lets look at that number now at 1% loss is 495lbs so what does that equate too?
A loss of 10% power going out the road draft tube is what it equates too!
Now this is just a theory based argument one of which I've personally seen the results similar to what I've discussed albeit in a gas engine that Bill built many years ago.
So there is a place, and a purpose for certain items in engine building.
Some people are against change due to lack of positive experiences with change, or lack of knowledge about them.
I'd really recommend, that you personally get a hold of sealed power and discuss with them the pro's and con's of a gapless ring in your engine. Then return here and post what they say. Compare that info to what you can research on the web.
Bottom line, if you are going to sleeve the block install new pistons, then I'd suggest the more you research and learn the better you are able to make informed decisions that will provide you a long strong running engine.
JM2CW
Al