there a couple of different brand air cleaner lids out there too...banks had one...ray-wel made one...
supposed to be more of a ram air. had one on mine N/A....not sure how much of a difference it made though
thats why i ended up scrapping my cab....the inter structure behind the outer skin on my ext cab was too bad to repair. there wasnt anything to align to to keep it straight.
ive set one against the banks pedestal. the waste gate actuator on the hx35 interferes with the intake...and if you push it forward it sits over top of the intake hole and you wont be able to get the horn back on
Brad is doing that on his...on the front I could maybe see it with that massive 6cyl but im still not convinced it needs it unless you plan on regularly overloading it beyond its gvw...
is the frame pitted badly like a nepa truck? Or still pretty smooth like a southern truck?
Cant say that I have ever heard of high oil pressure causing a crank to walk... only time ive heard of a crank walking is due to bearing failure or a flywheel/flexplate issue...as in the trans somehow putting pressure through the back of the crank
i wouldnt... let it flex
not to mention boxing in the frame will lend itself to collect crap and trap rust... look at every F150-350 from the 70's through early 90's... all had c-channel frames and worked just fine
i couldn't remember the specifics...i just know you posted pics of the knife edged splines on an input shaft many moons ago. wasn't trying to drag you down into depravity lol
both are good points... i am just trying to make sense of conflicting information.
racer30... that's exactly why in my particular 6.9 build I am planning on not milling the pistons as radically as it came to me. seems the original owner had the pistons milled .060 or .065 not sure of the...
In this statement your saying its detrimental to efficiency and possibly performance to change piston height. I understand WHY you lower the piston height and lower compression ratio...but your statement contradicts that.
Maybe I am off base here. Please don't take this as calling anyone...
ok...well i apologize... im seeing some old posts that better describe this...
again...i did not try and throw it out there as fact...was simply my observation...wrong or not....
with that said then... why do so many people decompress these engines when looking for more power and bigger...
Ill be posting some pics later but i just got done stripping down 2 7.3's to go to scrap.... i will be listing parts and prices later also...
Short list:
(2)- 1" thick trans adapter plate - $50ea
(2) - pair of valve covers - $20/pr
(2)-7.3l injection pump tower w/ip gear - $30 ea...
I'm not really sure how much this does effect any kind of flame swirl. What I feel it would do more then effect mixing gases...is more importantly it will cause more of a localized hot spot in the top of the piston. if you look at the shape of the reliefs, you have simple valve cutouts and a...
im not so sure on that compression ratio... i think 18-18.5:1 with pistons milled that far may be a bit optimistic. have you measured everything out and cc'ed the heads to verify? i would think you would be decking the block to the point the intake may not fit correctly to get back to that...
i have a 6.9L that had the pistons shaved .060 appx.. now it has 2 burnt pistons due to other reasons but the crowns look good after 7-10k... i plan on shaving the pistons im putting back in but not near that much. ill probably only go .040" to help with cold starting.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.