Superduty axle swap

swald

Registered User
Joined
May 12, 2020
Posts
52
Reaction score
27
Location
CO
...If you still have A/C you might consider using 2.5in pipes instead of 3". I don't have working A/C and 3" was still a pain. (Have the compressor still mounted but no belt or hoses).
Tnx. That's good to know since I do have AC
 

swald

Registered User
Joined
May 12, 2020
Posts
52
Reaction score
27
Location
CO
I may regret the gears but i think I'll like the look
You must be registered for see images attach
 

03wr250f

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Posts
643
Reaction score
396
Location
Hamilton/Montana
For any of you guys considering
I swapped from 4.10s to 3.55s and absolutely love it.
For those curious about what the rpms/speeds are and what speeds in the various trans gears look like. Search grimm-jeeper .com/gears
Can input and compare trans tcase, tire size and gear ratios


3.73s with 35s will be about the same effective final drive as 3.55s and 33s
But you will have more rubber hitting the ground, and more drag because of it.

If planning 35s I would suggest either 3.73 or 4.10s
You can do it with 3.55s but truck has to work harder.
 

Laine D

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Posts
1,362
Reaction score
1,945
Location
Northern California
When I had 4.10 gears and 37s I had no issue towing 14-17k. I also live in Texas...... I now have 33s and an 01 SD rear end with 373 gear and I notice no differance in towing or rpms. Not exactly apples to apples as far as your question is concerned, but fairly closish
You know (I know I’m super late) but if you calculate it all out your ratios are super close because of your tire size lol.
 

Laine D

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Posts
1,362
Reaction score
1,945
Location
Northern California
For any of you guys considering
I swapped from 4.10s to 3.55s and absolutely love it.
For those curious about what the rpms/speeds are and what speeds in the various trans gears look like. Search grimm-jeeper .com/gears
Can input and compare trans tcase, tire size and gear ratios


3.73s with 35s will be about the same effective final drive as 3.55s and 33s
But you will have more rubber hitting the ground, and more drag because of it.

If planning 35s I would suggest either 3.73 or 4.10s
You can do it with 3.55s but truck has to work harder.
Hated 3.55’s with 35’s, 33’s we’re way better. I haven’t driven with the super duty axles (3.73’s) but I’m excited to see the difference
 

Black dawg

Registered User
Joined
Jan 9, 2006
Posts
3,999
Reaction score
706
Location
sw mt
For any of you guys considering
I swapped from 4.10s to 3.55s and absolutely love it.
I just did this in the last couple months, and have not towed heavy with it, but it is so much nicer to drive. Makes much better use of the engines torque. Pretty dramatic mpg improvement as well. This is with stock height tires.
 

frankenwrench

overkill is under rated!
Joined
Oct 8, 2017
Posts
854
Reaction score
494
Location
Weatherford tx
That
You know (I know I’m super late) but if you calculate it all out your ratios are super close because of your tire size lol.
That was always my point. Lol. Found final ratio I was super happy with towing as well as good mpg and kinda stayed close. Kinda expensive to do micro adjustments so I just have to wait till my tires wear out. Still love the 3.73 gearing and improved breaking. Alot of people swear that the drum rears provide better breaking. I have 7 rigs here all different backgrounds and all been serviced by myself along the way at some point, and none have done as well on breaking as the sd rear end before I messed with them or after. To each their own I suppose.
 

Laine D

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Posts
1,362
Reaction score
1,945
Location
Northern California
That

That was always my point. Lol. Found final ratio I was super happy with towing as well as good mpg and kinda stayed close. Kinda expensive to do micro adjustments so I just have to wait till my tires wear out. Still love the 3.73 gearing and improved breaking. Alot of people swear that the drum rears provide better breaking. I have 7 rigs here all different backgrounds and all been serviced by myself along the way at some point, and none have done as well on breaking as the sd rear end before I messed with them or after. To each their own I suppose.
Maybe the drums do provide better braking. But discs are so much nicer to work on. Plus they clear water and everything way nicer
 

u2slow

bilge rat
Joined
May 8, 2007
Posts
1,829
Reaction score
819
Location
PNW
The parking brake definitely isn't as good with disc. Slide-off drums make the brakes quick and easy to service anyway.... Not like the old style.
 

Old Goat

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2021
Posts
1,655
Reaction score
1,642
Location
Northern Nevada
The parking brake definitely isn't as good with disc. Slide-off drums make the brakes quick and easy to service anyway.... Not like the old style.
Are you talking about the kit add on Disk Brakes, or the Factory set up?

I have read the add on`s have a problem.


Goat
 
Last edited:

IDIBRONCO

IDIBRONCO
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Posts
12,322
Reaction score
11,039
Location
edmond, ks
I don't have a lot of experience with that style, but I'll agree. They don't seem to hold much.
 

frankenwrench

overkill is under rated!
Joined
Oct 8, 2017
Posts
854
Reaction score
494
Location
Weatherford tx
Mine have been holding well the past 5 years so far even parked on incline with 30 ft gooseneck trailer. No problems so far. But as far as braking while driving the disk have been way better. Biggest issue I have had after sd swap, still have metric lug pattern in the back, and standard pattern in the front. Gotta keep 2 different spares for it. And forget rotating them. Pita
 
Top