7.3 cooling mod

Thewespaul

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Posts
8,796
Reaction score
8,058
Location
Bulverde, Texas
I did a pretty good comparison for this mod, stock internal na engine in the shop truck with a brand new cooling system and champion rad got replaced with a built idit. Temps are at least 40* lower with the same cooling system with the only change being the cooling mod.
 

The_Josh_Bear

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Posts
1,930
Reaction score
1,510
Location
Western WA
I, for one, am not going to get into an argument over whether on not this works. I feel that it does and even though it may be just in my head (which I doubt), I'll never pull the heads off of another 7.3 without doing this.
The effectiveness of the cooling mod isn't in your *head*, it's in your HEADS! :rotflmao
 

IDIBRONCO

IDIBRONCO
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Posts
12,312
Reaction score
11,021
Location
edmond, ks
The effectiveness of the cooling mod isn't in your *head*, it's in your HEADS! :rotflmao
This is true. A temperature gauge would probably never see the difference, but I truly believe that your heads do benefit from lower temperatures due to the better coolant flow.
 

Fision

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Posts
109
Reaction score
67
Location
Alaska
Finally found this thread!
Thanks IDIBRONCO, and all other contributors.
Just to idiot-proof this process for me, ‘cause that’s what I need:
• a total of 8 plugs are removed; 4 from the block and 2 from each head (thanks for the pics Thewespaul)
• 6.9 head gaskets
Did I miss anything?

As to the 6.9 gaskets, they have a smaller bore— that doesn’t overly crowd a 7.3 cylinder? Standard 6.9 gaskets work?
We’re you able to get your parts supplier to swap gaskets for your rebuild kit or did you simply buy a stand-alone head gasket.

The effectiveness of the cooling mod isn't in your *head*, it's in your HEADS! :rotflmao
Did Josh’s comment trigger The Cranberries “Zombie” for anyone else?
 

Thewespaul

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Posts
8,796
Reaction score
8,058
Location
Bulverde, Texas
The 6.9 gaskets go on with no issues with the bore, 8 plugs is correct. I stock rebuild kits if you don’t want to piece several kits together
 

franklin2

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Posts
5,179
Reaction score
1,412
Location
Va
I know very little about the cooling system on these engines. I have had a lot of experience working on Fords and other OEM vehicles and it is suspicious to me that the factory would go to the trouble and expense to install plugs in the heads and the block to purposely block these passages. That probably required 15 minutes of someone's time on the assembly line, extra inventory and expense of all those plugs. If they can save a dollar on each vehicle, that adds up.

So I bet there is a reason they are plugged. It may be something stupid like making the engine run hotter to help emissions, I don't know.

Sometimes I do these "mods" and find out what the reason was afterward. Like why they spent all that money for that complicated dual mass flywheel. No way would Ford be able to sell these trucks with them making all that noise at idle. And like the soup bowl mod. That seemed like a no brainer at the time when I read about it, and did it. But then people do not seem to comment or I guess they don't notice the constant low frequency drone from the intake when you are running at speed down the highway. It can get tiresome, though maybe some of you don't notice because you have a loud exhaust system.
 

Thewespaul

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Posts
8,796
Reaction score
8,058
Location
Bulverde, Texas
You’re right, international wouldn’t have spent the money on the plugs and hg if it wasn’t for a reason, that reason was to “improve cold weather emissions by holding more heat around each of the cylinders on the end of the block” they basically blocked off 4 cooling passages to get more heat to help minimize unburnt fuel when the engine is cold. Just like the further iterations of injectors and pump calibrations, it was all motivated by emissions.
 

Shaker Breaker

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Posts
42
Reaction score
9
Location
Commiefornia
Interesting... “deleting the valve stems seals “ sounds like a good idea. I just worry that a hot exhaust valve would get baked on oil from oil running down the stem after shut off. I’m tempted to try it. Thank you for the idea @Macrobb
 
Last edited:

Thewespaul

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Posts
8,796
Reaction score
8,058
Location
Bulverde, Texas
The 7.3 seals are much too restrictive imo, which was another emissions motivated change. I think running no seals would probably better for a toy with a high horsepower setup that doesn’t see a lot of miles. I run 6.9 seals in all my rebuilds and don’t have any guide wear issues or oil consumption.
 

Shaker Breaker

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Posts
42
Reaction score
9
Location
Commiefornia
The 7.3 seals are much too restrictive imo, which was another emissions motivated change. I think running no seals would probably better for a toy with a high horsepower setup that doesn’t see a lot of miles. I run 6.9 seals in all my rebuilds and don’t have any guide wear issues or oil consumption.
Right on Wes ... I didn’t know the stem seals between the 7.3 and 6.9 were different . I will stay running with my 6.9 seals .
 
Top