It'll all swap over just fine.
However... Why bother?
I'm pretty on the fence about which is better - Serpentine belts are easier to replace(one belt vs 3)... But so much more that can go wrong.
If *anything* fails on your serpentine setup, you lose your water pump. I've currently had both my serpentine trucks(92, 93) fail on me within months of purchasing them - on my 93, the tensioner bolt actually sheared off, leaving me in the cold and dark, 3 miles from the auto parts store on Sunday night at like 9PM. An hour from home.
On my 92, the vacuum pump siezed out of the blue(I checked it not a couple days before and it spun smoothly). This heated the belt to such an extent that the two ABS tensioner pulleys(that I had just replace) literally melted, then the belt shredded itself.
In *both* of these cases, it wasn't just a matter of slap a new belt in place - parts got broken.
I've had an alternator sieze on a V-belt truck - cut the belt and continue on.
I've had an alternator belt just disintegrate too(it was old, long past replacement time). I was able to take my time, find a good place to pull off and replace it. I could have driven home if I wanted to, without the alternator.
This is why I'm not convinced in the 'superiority' of the serpentine belt system... Single point of failure, anyone?