how would you plumb this?

IDIoit

MachinistFabricator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Posts
13,318
Reaction score
3,879
Location
commiefornia
ill have to re-do it all for the IC, but im good with that, the goal is to get the intake charged
 

laserjock

Almost there...
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Posts
8,841
Reaction score
3,129
Location
Maryland
I'd take the easiest path then. Do the log. It's not **** but it won't take long and it will be plenty effective. H shape. Whatever you call that one. The pipe between doesn't need to be large. It's just equalizing pressure.
 

IDIoit

MachinistFabricator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Posts
13,318
Reaction score
3,879
Location
commiefornia
You must be registered for see images


I don't know how high everything is, but I'm not a big square guy mske for to much turbulence.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

I fairly like this idea, opens up the IP, but I fear the turbos will fight against eachother.
 

rustygold

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2015
Posts
468
Reaction score
42
Location
conway Arkansas
Where they join but in a slight restrictions between the two. It will be like the same thing as cutting 1/2 in in a dual plan intake for a carb.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
 

rustygold

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2015
Posts
468
Reaction score
42
Location
conway Arkansas
You must be registered for see images


You just need enough air to stabilize between the two sides now to get the right size takes some number crunching.

As in boyle's law
You must be registered for see images


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

laserjock

Almost there...
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Posts
8,841
Reaction score
3,129
Location
Maryland
There's really no difference between the round or the log other than the rounded might flow a little better. The turbos aren't going to fight each other. The engine will only take what it will take. The turbos might fight the engine but functionally either of those is converting your dual intakes to a single intake. As big as those things are, I doubt you will see large boost numbers anyway. Being non-gated, they probably were not designed to make much down low and you are cutting the down low fueling essentially in half. You could go the RD route and build a box that slips over the intake tubes and then inlets from the turbos. If memory serves, that's kinda what his non-IC kit looks like.
 

IDIoit

MachinistFabricator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Posts
13,318
Reaction score
3,879
Location
commiefornia
I kniow I wont see big boost numbers now, I still need a larger IP, and I forsee the banks quick spool exhaust housings in my future.
ill be working on it today. no employees so its a strong bloody mary and a joint, well see what I come up with lol
 

FORDF250HDXLT

The life of an Indian is like the wings of the air
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Posts
6,456
Reaction score
1,127
Location
Maine & Oklahoma
no, my goal is to drive it out of the shop.
it wont be innercooled for a while, I have the material, and the time.. WTFN?

Don't get your ******* in a bunch,buttercup.I was just trying to help you save some time.:D
 

IDIoit

MachinistFabricator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Posts
13,318
Reaction score
3,879
Location
commiefornia
know the garrett quick spool is 1.0,
according to the prices, the banks is the .84 lol
 
Top