rebuild guide to NV4500

argve

Resident Fruitcake
Joined
Dec 11, 2004
Posts
7,510
Reaction score
32
Location
Gwynneville, Indiana
As we all know I'm going into the tranny here very very soon to replace the mainshaft and totally rebuild the tranny - I am in need of a rebuild guide.
 

suv7734

Registered User
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Posts
974
Reaction score
1
Location
BC Canada
T,

If you haven't seen this yet here is some good info:

Fifth Gear And The Dodge NV4500.

Having problems with Fifth Gear in your Dodge NV4500? There is a fix. According to the folks at Rockland Standard Gear, the Dodge NV4500 had a design defect in the splines on the mainshaft Fifth Gear. The splines were not long enough and they were manufactured with an incorrect angle. This caused a slight creep of the Fifth Gear on the mainshaft due to throttle changes, which resulted in many of the units having the Fifth Gear loosen its retaining nut. This allowed the gear to move out of position on the mainshaft and cease to function. If you have a Dodge NV4500 with this problem, you have options. One is to purchase the kit that RSG offers. It includes a gear and mainshaft that utilize split-ring washers under a locknut to retain the gear under thrust loads. It also has redesigned full-length splines on the gear and corrected spline angles.


We redid one for a buddy here a while ago and he got a good guide online from http://www.4x4repairmanuals.com/NV4500%20Transmission%20Shop%20Manual.htm
 

Whit

Registered User
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Posts
3,808
Reaction score
0
Location
lost in Why-homing
By Dan Guarino

Owners of diesel trucks equipped with NV4500 5 Speed Transmissions have been looking for a cure for 5th Gear failures from as early as 1993. The problem has been experienced with both General Motors trucks using the 6.5l V8 Diesel and Dodge trucks with the 5.9l inline 6 cylinder Cummins Diesel engine. So, exactly what is the problem and what is being done about it?

“I Lost 5th Gear!”

Almost all cases of Mainshaft 5ifth Gear failure can be directly attributed to insufficient support for 5th Gear. In the classic case, the nut retaining the Mainshaft Fifth Gear backs off allowing the Gear to slide back in the transmission extension housing and out of contact with countershaft 5th gear. This failure usually occurs without warning or noise. You are driving happily along in 5th gear, either you (or your cruise control) lets off on the accelerator for a moment. You step on the accelerator to resume speed and the engine races, but your transmission is no longer transmitting power! White faced and shocked, you mutter “what the #%!!” as you check to make sure the shifter is still in fifth, then downshift to fourth and let the clutch out. Your truck responds instantly as power is returned to the rear axle. Your blood pressure lowers a bit and you try to upshift to 5th. Again, no power and no noise! You mutter “Oh no, I lost fifth gear!” Back into fourth and away you go wondering if you are going to make it home and HOW MUCH IS THIS GOING TO COST ME TO FIX!

Typical 5th Gear failure on a stock NV4500HD Transmission. Note the reddish/orange sludge discoloring the shaft. This is a sign of wear or “fretting”. What you see is actually oxidized metal particles worn from the gear and shaft. Vibration and cyclic loads are the main causes of fretting

You must be registered for see images



Every time someone tells me “I lost 5th gear”, I am reminded of an occurrence in my youth. I was riding to school on a Brockway school bus. We had a lady bus driver who was a chronic gear grinder. One morning, when she was unable to force the transmission into fifth gear, she radioed the school that “I lost 5th Gear”. The reply was something to the effect “Wh’ad ya do drop it on the ground?”. I presume she had little solace with that reply, but she bravely continued on in 4th gear and we all eventually arrived at school. Like my bus driver, you too will probably also make it to your destination after your 4500 turns itself into a 4 speed because this type of failure normally does not cause incapacitating damage in the short term. Chances are, what occurred inside your transmission was simply the 5th gear wore into the mainshaft. Once the gear is loose, it will work the nut off until the gear slides back and your day is ruined.

Nut Woes: Band-Aid Approach to A Serious Problem

The initial attempts to prevent 5th gear failures focused on the retaining nut which was a flat nut without a lockwasher in the original configuration. New Venture first added a lip on the nut that could be crimped into a keyslot, then a concave spring lockwasher, and lastly a split nut with a crossbolt to increase the thread contact. The aftermarket weighed in with at least two styles of nuts with set screws. Several chemical thread locking compounds have also been tried. None of these “fixes” were successful in keeping the gear on the shaft. They failed because they address a consequence of the failure instead of the cause. (To find out the reasons why, read on.)

Clockwise from top left: Flat Nut, Concave Washer, Crimp Locknut, Crossbolt Locknut, Aftermarket Nut with 2 Set Screws, Aftermarket Nut with 3 Set Screws and Brass Pads

You must be registered for see images


Overloading Aggravates Problem

Before discussing the problems associated with factory Partial Spline and Aftermarket Full Spline Mainshaft designs, I want to point out that they are good quality parts made by reputable manufacturers. The 5th Gear failings they have are not metallurgy or workmanship related. Shaft wear and gear failure is primarily due to design, but diesel engine harmonics, and overloading also are significant factors. Owners of diesel powered NV4500 equipped trucks often greatly exceed the recommended horsepower and load ratings for their vehicle. We have seen these trucks with engines putting out over 500 horsepower and 1,000 ft-lbs. of torque. We have also seen combined truck and trailer weights exceeding 40,000 lbs.. Now, when you consider the NV4500 is rated for up to 460 ft-lbs. of torque and 19,000 lbs. combined truck and trailer weight, you can see why part of the responsibility for Transmission problems must rest on the shoulders of truck owners who grossly exceed the vehicle design limits and insist on making their ¾ or 1 ton work like a 2 or 3 ton truck

Mainshaft Types and Weak Points

To support the 5th Gear, the factory Mainshaft has both a splined area to transmit torque and a smooth machined surface for the fully internal splined gear to press onto. The end of the Mainshaft is drilled and tapped for a pull rod so the gear may be pressed on the shaft without damaging other components inside the Transmission. With this type of shaft, only the tips of the gear splines are in contact with machined support surface of the shaft. This area is also directly under the gear teeth. Over time, the gear splines will actually wear into the shaft. As this wear continues, the fit between the gear and shaft becomes progressively looser. At this point, every time you accelerate or decelerate in fifth gear, the gear moves back and forth between drive and coast. This back and forth motion against the nut is what eventfully causes the nut to back off. Since the mainshaft bearing is inboard of the gear, the Transmission will usually operate in all other speeds.

Stock New Venture Mainshafts from Dodge NV4500HD Transmissions.

The top shaft had the typical fifth gear failure. The splines are worn and you can see the wear marks in the support surface to the right of the splines.

The lower shaft is a new takeout in perfect condition. Note, the support surface is smooth
You must be registered for see images

The aftermarket introduced two types of imported Mainshafts with near full length splines in an attempt to remedy the problems experienced with the factory shafts. The splines on these shafts are considered “flexible” in the sense the gear is not supported by pilot rings at either end so it can “flex”, or rock under load. Both styles are used with the same fifth gear design as original equipment. These shaft are most often sold with an Aftermarket Mainshaft Nut that has two setscrews.

First on the market was a shaft with splines that were made to provide a fairly light interference or press fit with the gear splines. This shaft design was introduced by Blumenthal Manufacturing of Oklahoma City. Next on the market was a shaft made for gear wholesaler Midwest Transmission of Zumbrota, MN. With this design, the shaft splines are near full length, but machined to be a slip fit with the gear. This shaft is grooved to allow a 3 piece thrust washer to be inserted between the gear and retaining nut. Both of these shaft designs received tremendous positive press coverage as permanent cures for 5th gear failures and were enthusiastically sold by almost everyone in the transmission repair business, including us. Unfortunately, great confidence in these designs has not proven to be fully justified. While the percentage of 5th gear and related failures is probably lower with either full spline shaft design in comparison to the factory shafts, the cold truth is full spline shaft failures are occurring.

With the press fit type full spline shaft, gear failures are identical to the original equipment shaft. In other words, the gear loosens up on the shaft and eventfully works the nut off the threads. To have any chance of keeping fifth gear in place, the press fit between the shaft splines and gear splines with this type of shaft must be quite tight. We rejected nearly 50% of the shafts we bought of this design because they did not provide a tight enough fit with the gear. Long before we ever even heard of any failures with this type of shaft, I discussed the importance of accurate machining with the importer and the need to increase the spline contact to prevent the same types of problems we had with the factory shafts.

Full Spline Shaft with Light Press Fit Splines



You must be registered for see images


The other full spline shaft utilizes a thrust washer between the gear and nut. With this design, I know of no instances were the nut backed off. On the downside, this shaft was designed so the 5th gear will easily slip onto the shaft. This slip fit means the gear and shaft splines may eventfully wear themselves away, at which point you could “lose” fifth even though the nut is still in place. This is a very noisy failure as the spline nubs jump over each other, plus all the worn away spline material contaminates your oil. There is one other major issue with this shaft. A secondary function of the fifth gear is to keep the mainshaft rear bearing tight against a thrust washer. With this shaft design, the loose fitting gear cannot hold the bearing tight. If this bearing is not held tight, it tends to wear into the shaft and thrust washer which increases end-play. Excessive end-play can lead to shifting problems, shaft misalignment, and catastrophic failure. This style of shaft is somewhat weaker than other designs due to the reduced shaft diameter at the thrust washer groove. Breakage is not common, but it does occasionally snap in high load situations. Despite the potential shortcomings, this shaft design is very popular with both professional rebuilders and shade tree mechanics because assembly is fast and easy without any press tools.

Full Spline Shaft grooved for thrust washer.

You must be registered for see images


The Surprise Culprit Is…..

The 5th gear splines used on all NV4500 Transmissions are of side fit, involute configuration. Involute splines are self-centering, have curved sides, and offer greater torque-transmitting capacity than any other type. Side fit means only a portion of the flanks of each spline are in contact with the mating spline and it is this characteristic that is culprit #1 in the Case of the Lost 5th Gear.

Side fit, involute splines are widely used and well proven for transmitting inline torque. Common examples include input shafts, output shafts, synchronizer hubs, transfer case chain sprockets, propeller shaft slip yokes, pinion yokes, and axle shafts. This spline style is not often used to transmit torque in applications were the torque input is from the side as is the case of the NV4500 mainshaft fifth gear, unless there is some type of additional support (such as pilot rings) to prevent the gear from rocking on the shaft. None of the previously discussed mainshafts use any type of ring or pilot to prevent axial movements occurring under load although the factory gear does derive some weak support from the unsplined portion of the shaft.

If you take a magnifying glass and view a cross section of a 5th gear pressed on the mainshaft splines, you will clearly see the no-contact areas between the tips of each spline and the root of the matching spline. You can also see how short the contact surface is between mating splines. The 5th gear to mainshaft contact area of the mating splines is less than .040” high. The unsupported, no-contact areas or voids, are greater than 1/2 the distance from the minor diameter of the shaft to the major diameter of the gear. With both the factory and full spline shafts these unsupported areas are where wear and eventual failure begin. Such movement will be minute at first, but over time it will increase as the matching parts wear. To eliminate movement, we must have effective and rigid support for the 5th gear. To do this we need to change the design of the shaft, gear, and retaining nut.

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images


Now, lets turn our attention back to the much maligned factory Mainshaft with it’s partial 5th gear spline. These shafts have a spline length of just under ¾”. In addition, for additional gear support there is a smooth machined surface just over 1” long. For manufacturing reasons, there are also reduced diameter areas between the splines and support surface and between these two features and adjacent portions of the shaft. The matching gear (which is also used on both full spline shafts) is 2.25” long with internal splines cut the length of the gear. The gear splines are beveled at each end.

Many people assume New Venture choose partial splines over full splines because it was cheaper. The fact is it is more expensive to make a partial spline shaft. Why? The splines are rolled before the shaft is hardened. After the shaft is heat treated to harden it, the support surface is ground to a very, very precise dimension. New Venture could have saved money by rolling full length splines in the first place. So why didn’t they? Well, I can’t be sure, but a comment made to me by a New Venture engineer about the importance of keeping 5th gear concentric on the shaft had to be a consideration. New Venture tried to use the gear splines pressed onto a smooth support surface instead of pilot rings. This approach is reasonably effective with gas engines and moderate loads. However, with diesels, the engine harmonics and horsepower in heavy duty applications creates loads beyond what this design can handle without wear given the shaft size. With a factory Mainshaft and Gear, you typically “lose” 5th gear when the gear splines have worn into the shaft to the point where repeated axial gear movement works the nut free. New Venture tried to fix the problem by addressing the consequence (by changing the nut design) of the gear working loose, instead of the cause (insufficient gear support). End result: A big problem and a bad reputation for an otherwise excellent Transmission.

Cross-section view of 5th gear pressed over unsplined portion of factory shaft.

Look through magnifying glass and note how splines have already slightly indented shaft when pressed on.

Now, let’s take a look at the press fit, full spline shaft. The theory here is longer splines are better, but the side contact, “flexible” spline with it’s limited spline to spline contact and large unsupported areas makes this design subject to the same types of failure as experienced with the factory Mainshaft. Some support can be derived by having a very tight fit between the gear and shaft. However, with the “average” fit, premature failure is a distinct possibility.

The concept of the thrust washer style full spline shaft is simple. The design assumes the gear is going to come loose anyway, so they grooved the shaft to accept a split thrust washer between the gear and nut. With this design the thrust washer will probably keep the nut on. The problem here is the designers concentrated on preventing the nut from backing off and ease of assembly. In this they were successful, however, by making the shaft so fifth gear and the rear bearing would be a slip fit, wear and fretting is almost guaranteed. Result: Potential for reduced service life.

You must be registered for see images
 

argve

Resident Fruitcake
Joined
Dec 11, 2004
Posts
7,510
Reaction score
32
Location
Gwynneville, Indiana
good information there Kevin.

I got the shaft on the way :thumbsup:

So one part down... Now I need to find the counter rotating gear for 5th - we broke that when the event happened (couple of teeth bought the farm)... :eek: cookoo

But it seems that there are a couple of different ratios and I need to make sure that I get the correct one - so that might have to wait until I get the transmission out to make sure I get the correct one.
 

Whit

Registered User
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Posts
3,808
Reaction score
0
Location
lost in Why-homing
I cant find nuttin bout different gear ratios????

Here is some additional info that may help too

What are the NV4500 Design Specifications?
Current Production NV4500 Specifications*:


Synchronization.........................................All Gears
Main Case..................................................Cast iron
Shift Cover................................................Aluminum alloy
Gear Bearing.............................................Caged roller
Main Shaft Pilot........................................Straight roller
Lubricant....................................................SyntorqLT Synthetic 75w85w gear lubricant
Shift Pattern...............................................Same as Getrag
Tailhousing................................................Aluminum alloy
Support Bearing........................................Timken tapered roller
Input Thrust...............................................Flat thrust bearing assembly
Dry Weight...............................................195 pounds
Rated Gross Vehicle Weight...................HD: 16,000 pounds, LD: 15,000 pounds
Rated Gross Combined Weight...............HD: 21,000 pounds, LD: 19,000 pounds
Torque Rating............................................HD: 460 lb.-ft. LD: 410 lb.-ft
Oil Capacity Transmission Only..............4 quarts, but we recommend 4.5 quarts
Oil Capacity including TC adapter ...........5 quarts (when replacing Getrag)
PTO.............................................................Standard 6 bolt on each side
Dodge HD Input Shaft................................1 1/4" 10 spline with .750" pilot tip diameter
Dodge LD Input Shaft................................1 1/8" 10 spline with .750" pilot tip diameter
GM Input Shaft...........................................1 1/8" 10 spline with .590" pilot tip diameter
Dodge 4x4 Output Shaft............................HD: 29 spline, LD: 23 spline
Dodge 4x2 Output Shaft............................HD: 31 spline, LD: 30 spline
GM 4x4 Output Shaft................................32 spline
Bellhousing Bolt Pattern ..........................top 10.078", bottom 9.738" Height 6.043", 5.600" index
Bellhousing Bolt Pattern 1993-95 GM...top 10.078", bottom 10.394" Height 4.685" 5.125" index

*NV4500HD models are used with Cummins Diesel & V10. NV4500LD models are used for all other applications.




What are the major design changes?
The NV4500 series transmissions have undergone many minor and major design changes since 1992. The minor changes, while important for durability and shifting ease, are not easily identifiable to the layman trying to determine the features of a particular transmission. The following list shows the major changes we have identified. To precisely identify a particular transmission by part number, get the numbers off the build tag on the left PTO cover and the decals on top of the top cover.

The light duty 1" 19 spline input shaft used in 1992-93 was changed to 1 1/8" 10 spline in 1994.

1992-93 models had a coarse thread shift stub. This was replaced by a square stub that accepted a press on shift lever for 1994-1997. A metric threaded shift stub was introduced for 1998.

1992-1996 had an interlock mechanism built into the 1-2 syncro to prevent high speed downshifts into 1st or second gear. This feature was dropped during the 1996 model year

In 1997, New Venture changed the design of reverse gear from a dual plane to a single plane. The reverse gear ratio was changed from 5.61:1 to 5.04:1.

For 1998, the shift tower and shift handle were redesigned. 2WD models no longer had a speedometer drive (the speedo works off the rear axle). 4x4 tailshaft housings were changed to eliminate mountings for the transfer case shift lever. Also, with HD models, the mainshaft nut was redesigned late in 1998. This change first showed up on transmissions with an AD suffix on the Dodge part number (ex: 52108131AD)
 

Whit

Registered User
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Posts
3,808
Reaction score
0
Location
lost in Why-homing
you may wanna look into yer tailshaft hopusing as well

Documenting Defects in Imported NV4500 Cast Iron Tailshaft Housings

By Dan Guarino

It all started with a phone call from a customer who was stranded 400 miles from home with a blown 5th gear in an NV4500 transmission we had sent him about 6 months back. From his description of what happened, I knew it had to be either a countershaft clutch failure or fifth gear tooth breakage. The customer also mentioned the transmission had been unduly noisy since day one. Now some gear noise especially in 5th gear at low rpm's is not unusual with NV4500 transmissions, but the customer stated this transmission was definitely a bit on the loud side.

Well, when you are in the business of fixing things and selling parts, you know sooner or later something is going to come back at you. Still, out of all the hundreds of NV4500 transmissions we had worked on or sold since our first one 1996, our NV4500 comebacks totaled one brand new transmission in 1997 with a cracked case, and 5 rebuilt transmissions in 2001 that had to have the reverse shift fork pads replaced when a supplier had sneaked some counterfeit pads into an order of genuine New Venture parts.

About 4 days later the transmission showed up at our door. From the moment I got my hands on it and turned the shafts, I knew we had a case of 5th gear tooth breakage, but why? Actual gear breakage in NV4500 transmissions is rare and fifth gear tooth breakage is almost unheard of.

A few weeks prior to this incident, we had learned our supplier of these cast iron bellhousings knew of an interference problem with certain NV241 transfer cases but was not telling anyone about it.. We had one of those problems with a 1996 Dodge so I called them up and spoke to our about-to-retire salesman. He told me they knew of some problems but not many. OK that gave us a clue, so before pulling the tailshaft housing, we looked for evidence the transfer case bearing retainer was hitting the tailshaft housing, and sure enough, three marks were visible back of the cast iron housing. These dents were caused by the transfer case bearing retainer bottoming out against the tailshaft housing. We then pulled the tailshaft housing and looked at what was left of the fifth gears. Yep you guessed it, an uneven wear pattern was present confirming the failure was a case of mis-alginment. We checked the tooth angle on the gears, it was perfect. Next, we checked the gear bores and shafts for trueness, again right on the money. So, at that point, the cast iron tailshaft housing was suspect #1.

Areas where NV241 Transfer Case Bearing Retainers hit imported cast iron tailshaft housings before transfer case mating flange is tight against cast iron output housing. This problem seems to occur primarily on 1997 and older Dodge 2500 and 3500 trucks with the wide input bearing. This can cause the transfer case to be cocked or mis-aligned Excessive gear noise, bearing failures, transfer case breakage, transmission gear failure, and propeller shaft vibrations are all possible. This interference problem can be corrected by modifying either or both the tailshaft housing and transfer case bearing retainer.

Believing we had found the cause of the failure, we bored out the tailshaft housing to provide clearance. To be on the safe side, we also decided to check the bores on the cast iron housing. We couldn't believe the results so we checked 3 more cast iron housings and 3 original equipment housings. To verify the results we had a machine shop perform the same tests. What follows is from the documentation we sent the supplier:


To check the run-out:

1. Brand new NV4500 transmission case were securely mounted on a vertical mill with the rear output bearing bore up (two cases were used, results the same on either case). A indicator reading was taken off the rear face to check for parallelism to the mill table and front face. The rear case faces are square within .001”.

2. A co-axial indicator was attached to the spindle

3. The mill table was adjusted so the output bearing bore was perfectly concentric to the mill spindle. (x=.000”, y=.000”)

4. Each tailshaft housing was bolted to the transmission case. Two NVG factory supplied dowel pins were used to align the tailshaft housing to the case.

5. On 4x4 housings, Indicator readings were taken off the seal bore, transfer case pilot bore, and rear face. The 4x2 housing was checked in bushing bore and seal bore.

Yellow Lines indicate x and y axis for run-out measurement



4x4 Housing #1: x –.005”, y –.015”

4x4 Housing #2: x –.0095”, y– .023”

4x4 Housing x-.007”, y-.019”

4x2 Housing x-.006”, y-.017”

All 3 OE Housings had maximum runout of between .0005” and .0015”

The rear faces on all 4x4 tailshaft housings both OE and cast iron are parallel to within .001” to the case.

Then seal bore is concentric within .001” to the mounting pilot bore or bushing bores on all housings.

Conclusion:

Since the cast iron housings tested were purchased over the span of nearly one year, and all four have been found to be machined significantly off center in relation to the centerline of the mainshaft, it is my conclusion that a very significant percentage of all cast iron housings are defective and need to be recalled for replacement or correction. The 4x4 housings are also not suited for use with many 1994-1997 transfer cases without modifying the tailshaft housing and/or transfer case input bearing retainer.

Furthermore, one of the 4x4 housings also showed evidence of the 5th gear synchronizer sleeve rubbing against it (this customer complained of a faint rubbing sound)

My gut feeling is 99.9% of all cast iron housings are defective and would greatly exceed the .002” run-out which would seem the maximum allowable for this application.

You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images





(signed)
Dan Guarino
 

Whit

Registered User
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Posts
3,808
Reaction score
0
Location
lost in Why-homing
was crusing found a update on this post thought it would be helpful


Well, as I write this article in March of 2005, we are working on contacting all our customers who may have purchased a cast iron tailshaft housing from us. We are also waiting for the supplier to "Do the Right Thing" and issue a recall. I think they will, but if they don't you can be sure I will put their name in this article!

This type of problem was reported with another cast iron housing sold by different outfit several years ago. Before we ever purchased these things and several times over the next few years, we asked our salesman if their housings ran true. The answer was always yes. I wish we would have checked a housing ourselves years ago, but we didn't. So if you have a cast iron tailshaft housing from us and we have not yet contacted you, CALL US!

As final note, the trouble we found with these housings is typical of many if not most of the repair parts coming from Asia at this time. Overseas quality control on transmission and axle parts is for the most part poor, and the American importers are usually more interested in selling lots of high profit parts instead of checking for quality before the sale. I am sure many of you have noticed most of the parts we offer are made in North America. The reason is simple: In the 30 years I have been in this business, our comeback rate on parts from the United States and Canada is 1/20th of the warranty rate on the few imported parts we do sell. You can also be sure if we ever sell another cast iron housing it will be accurately Made in U.S.A. or if we can't get a foundry to cast them here, we will check every #$@&# imported one ourselves before it leaves!

UPDATE January, 2008

The company that imported and distributed the bellhousings described above was Blumenthal Mfg. of Tulsa, Oklahoma. When we first informed Blumenthal's about the problems we found with their cast-iron NV4500 tailshaft housings we expected a speedy resolution to the problem and we anticipated, from past experiences with Mr. Kevin Blumenthal, that Blumenthal Mfg. would do the "right thing" and stand behind their product. Blumenthal Mfg. has never denied the housings were defective in any of the correspondence exchanged between myself and Blumenthal's General Manger, Phil Warren, who described the housings to me with the words "They are all jacked up". Now, 34 months later and after more reminders, we are still waiting for Blumenthal Mfg. to "Do the Right Thing" ........
 
Top